<modsnip> Well what the heck was I thinking...He’s just a violent sex offender who gang raped and sodomized a woman, and buried PH’s body, but there hasn’t been much else that shows foul play here here?? Yeah we don’t have COD and tox yet, but last seen and buried by a violent sex offender? After she clearly texted she was in trouble, obviously sensing danger, which she was right about after all...Considering what we know about sex offenders like this, chances are high imo that this was a sexually motivated crime and any seasoned LE or profiler or forensic psychologist who has experience with these types of individuals will likely tell you that, moo. There’s a reason why criminal history is important. But we of course need PROOF which will come soon, one way or the other, hopefully.
Sure, there’s a chance she OD’d, but we are certainly not off base for making this leap or speculation, that based on his “horrendous” criminal history...Why are we talking about “horrendous crimes”? Because that’s EXACTLY what FH has committed in the past, “horrendous crimes”.
Additionally I find it interesting many people are inclined to still talk about the co-workers/friends as being involved here- the co-worker is not the one who buried her. She is not the violent gang rapist sex offender. Why is this guy getting so much benefit of the doubt? Do his charges and criminal past need to be spelled out for everyone in bold letters?? He’s a monster obviously! Sure innocent until proven guilty, would I convict at this point, no as we don’t have COD and tox, but I’m not sure why people are finding it so hard to grasp that this very well could be a sexual crime and outright murder. We have numerous cases where autopsy results are inconclusive, etc., though foul play is likely. Some people are making the focus of her addiction the main point here, as well as co-workers who have, at this point, NO CONNECTiON to him that we know of, etc., and while I think her drug history could be a potential factor and perhaps even part of puzzle here, the main thing here IMO is WHO IS THIS INDIVIDUAL that LE wants?? What have his prior actions shown that he is capable of? A woman died in his presence on his watch and is buried on land tied to him...
I have mentioned several times that there are several reasons someone may panic. It’s not like these theories are not getting an opportunity to be voiced because they are.
If he wasn’t a violent sex offender I would look at this case differently. It is perhaps prejudicial and biased, but that’s the whole reason there’s an RSO registry to begin with, so people know about these individuals, because they present a potential danger to society and anyone in their path, moo. Many of these RSOs reoffend. I need evidence contrary that he did not assault PH, not the other way around, and until then, based on what I know about individuals like this, he is not getting ANY benefit of the doubt from me, and I consider this opinion to come from a place of education and experience.