Chris_Texas
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2011
- Messages
- 1,926
- Reaction score
- 5
Obviously things like hair dye or style, in themselves, are not signs of parental abuse, and I doubt anyone would suggest that they were. In Aliahna's case we are essentially forced to consider these things, as the parent's behavior shows negligence at best, with more sinister possibilities as a very plausible option.
When my daughter was just an infant I took her with me to work to show her off. We went by the cafeteria where all my friends were eating lunch. I got hungry, I figured maybe she was hungry too, and I didn't have her bottle with me... so I fed her some french fries. She was totally fine -- seemed to enjoy them actually -- but I was definately NOT fine when my wife discovered what I had fed our baby for lunch.
I was negligent.
What these parent's did was not negligence. It was the equivalent of handing your baby a plugged in circular saw to play with... in the tub. Do that, and when the blood and sparks start flying, shrugging your shoulders and saying "Who knew?" doesn't cut it. There is negligence (doing something stupid out of ignorance or a lack of attention) and then there is deliberate conduct that a reasonable person would conclude is likely to cause serious injury or death. Which is what we are discussing in this case.
Handing a power saw to your daughter, or handing your daughter off to a strange man to keep in his home for a few days, in either case it is only reasonable to suspect the parent who did it. If something is predictable then it is reasonable to assume that it was predicted. Which is why we look and evaluate everything that we know. Sometimes hair dye is just a fashion statement, but hair dye on a murdered girl deserves our attention.
When my daughter was just an infant I took her with me to work to show her off. We went by the cafeteria where all my friends were eating lunch. I got hungry, I figured maybe she was hungry too, and I didn't have her bottle with me... so I fed her some french fries. She was totally fine -- seemed to enjoy them actually -- but I was definately NOT fine when my wife discovered what I had fed our baby for lunch.
I was negligent.
What these parent's did was not negligence. It was the equivalent of handing your baby a plugged in circular saw to play with... in the tub. Do that, and when the blood and sparks start flying, shrugging your shoulders and saying "Who knew?" doesn't cut it. There is negligence (doing something stupid out of ignorance or a lack of attention) and then there is deliberate conduct that a reasonable person would conclude is likely to cause serious injury or death. Which is what we are discussing in this case.
Handing a power saw to your daughter, or handing your daughter off to a strange man to keep in his home for a few days, in either case it is only reasonable to suspect the parent who did it. If something is predictable then it is reasonable to assume that it was predicted. Which is why we look and evaluate everything that we know. Sometimes hair dye is just a fashion statement, but hair dye on a murdered girl deserves our attention.