butwhatif?
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2008
- Messages
- 3,598
- Reaction score
- 40
Oh, it is definately a HUGE difference! He has said numerous times that she is innocent. Not "not guilty", but flat out innocent. He better start rewording that before trial gets here or a jury is going to expect him to prove her innocence in the face of overwhelming evidence pointing to her guilt.
I picked this one out straight away too, and agree its HUGE. Between KC's demeaner at the last hearing, and JB saying 'my client tells me she is not guilty'.... rather than 'she's 100% inocent and we can prove it' , I'm sensing that something is going on behind the scenes here. I suspect it has more to do with the team of attys he's now working with. (I bet he hates that its not a one man show anymore).
JB cant go from 'she's completely innocent' to ' actually she may have been involved', but maybe he's slowly working towards that now.
It reminds me of how princess diana used to have to get her hair trimmed regularly so their was no sudden drastic changes.
Hoping for an eventual guilty plea, but not holding my breath.
JMO