Anthonys' P.I. Accused Of Lying On Stand

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

New Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
O/T Kathi Belich called the statement regarding the "clear and compelling evidence that the body was placed at that location" while Casey was in jail a "Mistake." Is that what the defense is stating now? That her attorney was just blowing smoke?

It just gets worse and worse.
 
Spangle said:
I think it was hard for him to stay on track with the judge constantly interrupting him so that the Judge can seem "wise."
Click to expand...

o...m...g GREAT MINDS THINK ALIKE! I was about to type the exact same thing. That Judge is something else.....:crazy:
 
believe09 said:
O/T Kathi Belich called the statement regarding the "clear and compelling evidence that the body was placed at that location" while Casey was in jail a "Mistake." Is that what the defense is stating now? That her attorney was just blowing smoke?

It just gets worse and worse.
Click to expand...

Wow! stating 'clear and compelling evidence...' as a mistake is not a good fall-back as he either has it or doesn't. Sheesh, did they have a special on legal degree's? Blowing smoke to the media is one thing but trying it in the court of law is quite another. That defense team is a joke imo
 
believe09 said:
O/T Kathi Belich called the statement regarding the "clear and compelling evidence that the body was placed at that location" while Casey was in jail a "Mistake." Is that what the defense is stating now? That her attorney was just blowing smoke?

It just gets worse and worse.
Click to expand...

Me thinks Macaluso is
backpeddling.gif
! Or maybe we mis-heard his mis-truth?:rolleyes:
 
Spangle said:
And the court assumed he was telling the truth while on the stand. But the motion that has been filed shows proof that he was lying.

JB can be typing up contracts as we speak. But it's to late for that to fix everything. DC has all ready stated, under oath, to the LE that he was NOT undercontract to KC or JB after the middle of October. Which is the opposite of what he stated on the stand last week. He made it completely clear that he was not under contract with them, and JUST with CA and GA.

That puts DC in direct hot water. The contracts will not save him. He either lied to the LE in the murder case or he lied to the Judge in the ZFG case. And the Judge in the murder case all ready ruled his conversations were not privileged. Which shows they were wasting this judges time. OUCH!
Click to expand...
Hi spangle...forgive me, but I just recently re-read DC's LE interview, and although he did state his service contract with Jose came to an end, I do not think he said the one with Casey ever came to an end...did he? Did I miss that somehow?:confused:
 
http://www.forthepeople.com/New_Motion_to_Compel.pdf

December 9th email from Dominic Casey, which was read to him by Deputy Allen:

“JA: I have an e-mail, uh, it, it I ... uh, it appears to be from you. Okay, it’s dated December the 9th. And it says uh, it says here, we’ll I’ll let you read it okay? It, it says that you, you’re working for George and Cindy.

DC: That is correct.

JA: Okay. It also says that uh...

DC: That’s correct.

JA: (Sighs) Okay, uh, for the sole purpose of finding Caylee Marie. John, D & A Investigations do uh, do work (inaudible) disclosed of, of, and, and, and uh, and are not connected uh, nor does D & A Investigations find any uh, kind of services uh, to the defense team.

DC: That is correct

JA: Okay, so it, it’s somewhat confusing. You say that you’re working for George and Cindy, but you’re also working for Casey. And Casey’s charged and ...

DC: Let me clarify that John.

JA: Okay, that would be good.

DC: Alright. I have not spoken to, I have not seen Casey since that would be Sunday, October the 12th.

(clip)
DC: As of effective October the 12th is the last conversation, or whatever, that I’ve ever had with Casey Anthony. I’ve not provided any services from that day forward.

JA: Okay.

DC: And exclusively from that date of only being providing services to George and Cindy Anthony.
 
http://www.forthepeople.com/Exhibit_D.pdf

A Yes. There is a confidentiality – confidentiality and nondisclosure agreement.
Q There is an agreement that would have been in place in November?
A It was in place from July of 2008 and is still current today.

pg 51
Q Continuously throughout then up to today?
A It is still in effect.
Q And there were no gaps where it wasn’t in place?
A No, sir.
Q And through that whole time, you would have had a confidentiality agreement with – from July up through today – with Cindy Anthony – I’m sorry – Casey Anthony and/or Jose Baez, one or the other, or both?
A Both and more. Both and more.
pg 49
Q Okay. So early September, would that have been a written agreement, contract?
A Yes
Q Signed by Casey Anthony?
A Yes
Q Did that come to an end?
A No, sir
Q So when you were – so in November when you were out in the woods, you were under contract to Casey Anthony; is that right?
A That would be one of the people.
Q Who else at that time?
A George and Cindy Anthony.
Q George and Cindy. Anyone else? How about Jose Baez, the lawyer.
A It would also be the Baez Law Firm

pg 50
Q so when you were out in the woods in the vicinity where the remains were found, you would have been working under contract for Casey Anthony, Jose Baez and George and Cindy all at that time?
A That would be correct.
 
magic-cat said:
Hi spangle...forgive me, but I just recently re-read DC's LE interview, and although he did state his service contract with Jose came to an end, I do not think he said the one with Casey ever came to an end...did he? Did I miss that somehow?:confused:
Click to expand...

ThinkTank said:
http://www.forthepeople.com/New_Motion_to_Compel.pdf

December 9th email from Dominic Casey, which was read to him by Deputy Allen:
<snip>

DC: Let me clarify that John.

JA: Okay, that would be good.

DC: Alright. I have not spoken to, I have not seen Casey since that would be Sunday, October the 12th.

(clip)
DC: As of effective October the 12th is the last conversation, or whatever, that I&#8217;ve ever had with Casey Anthony. I&#8217;ve not provided any services from that day forward.

JA: Okay.

DC: And exclusively from that date of only being providing services to George and Cindy Anthony.
Click to expand...

Think Tank all ready beat me too it.

It seems to me, that he is making it very clear that after Oct 12, he no longer worked for Casey Anthony. And only for CA and GA. IIRC, he stopped working for JB on 10/1/08 (end of contract date).

ETA: E-mail referenced was on Dec 9, 2008. The LE interview was Jan 7, 2009.
 
DC really stepped in a deep pile of doodoo. And he doesn't have the shoes for it. LOL

What a bunch of sleazy people. Caylee deserves better!
 
livelaughluv said:
i wrote this, deleted it, rewrote it and if the admins/mods feel it inappropriate, please delete it..i am just filled with heartache for caylee...

We will never hear any truth coming from the a's camp, which includes baez and co., imo..

It sure seems to me, the bricks are stacking up and the walls are closing in on kc.

From the alleged lie of dc, on what took him to suburban, to the statment of her alleged innocense from her defense attorney. I want to see the evidence uncovered to show that! Imo, the prosecution will counter that and show caylee was placed at suburban soon after her demise in mid to late june.


Why would dc chose not to tell the truth, put his pi license on the line and risk going to prison? Does what he know implicate others?

See this is why it is so important the a's or anyone involved with caylee's demise (be it before or after the fact) never be given immunity or limited immunity. Imo, they seem to be all involved and most of it is covering, after the fact.( i do not think the a's are involved in caylee's demise, it's evident they loved her much.) they had their chance to come forward for over a year now but haven't. Caylee deserves justice, she also deserves to have her grandparents in her corner and i think they should step up and tell kc they love her, they will support her but she must tell the truth on what happened to caylee and beg the judge for leniency in sparing her life. Her parents should not be covering for her, if indeed they did! The anthony's should not risk going to jail for a crime their own child may be responsible for. the anthony's can never be genuine "crime victims advocates", until they can come to terms with the truth and should also beg for justice for caylee's sake. it's time for kc to take responsiblity for her actions and the grandparents stand up for their grandchild they adored.

I think we are getting down to the brass tacks now with dc opening that can of worms. If there is evidence the state presents that can prove kc is guilty as charged , then it would be in her best interest to take a plea, if it's still available to her..i think she should do that and spare the gory details on caylee's last moments alive...

all above is just my most humble opinion..:justice:

justice for caylee​
[nnm/size]
Click to expand...


bbm

absolutely.
 
OT kinda, but what do you think they will get from deposing Mallory?

Maybe some truth?
 
Spangle said:
IT is only with the new motion, that Judge Strickland ruling will be entered into court as evidence.

WE do not know if Judge Rodriquez was aware of it when DC was on the stand the other day.
Actually, If the first motion was filed after Strickland ruled, it would have been nice if it was included in the motion. But I guess the lawyers that the judge would use the same law and reasoning that Strickland used, to come to the same conclusion.
Click to expand...



Yay! Okay I didn't see that, but it is good if Judge Strickland's ruling will be entered...

I assumed Judge Rodriguez did know about Judge Strickland's ruling, because Judge R. made it known he had put in many hours looking at the motions and strived to be "one step ahead of the attorneys." Had he given so much consideration to KC's life or death plight, as he states, he should have reviewed the court documents from the DC part of the criminal case.
 
RR0004 said:
But, I think it is relevant to have DC answer questions about his conversations with his clients- George and Cindy. How does the judge know if the questions in the deposition are relevant if the deposition hasn't gone forward? It was my impression that the Judge here got stuck in "assumption" mode.
Click to expand...



I don't think it has anything to do w/ relevance either, and John Morgan was at his wit's end trying to understand it-Morgan even stated what you wrote above, to no avail. I think that's when the judge said the thing about trying to shield KC's criminal case from DC's civil testimony.
Morgan seemed floored that the judge was asking him to accept a ruling of relevance that really had more to do with protecting the woman that defamed ZG. But the judge came down hard when JM fought him on it, and might as well have told JM to shut up and move on.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

DNASolves

Who is Fairfield County Jane Doe (1993)?

Staff online

Members online

... and 176 more.
Total: 416 (members: 177, guests: 239)

Online statistics

Members online
177
Guests online
239
Total visitors
416
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
608,477
Messages
18,240,096
Members
234,385
Latest member
johnwich
Back
Top