A real big, real bright lightbulb just went off over my head.
The light bulb was flashing over my head earlier today.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A real big, real bright lightbulb just went off over my head.
I do wonder if BW is the BW from Dragon's Den.
Brad said 'nancy never jogs alone, she never jogs from home. She always drives somewhere to meet up with the jogging buddy. How soon we forget. Brad said she went jogging with CC, because Nancy doesn't jog alone.
I seem to recall that the BW that NC knew was in the oil business?
IIRC...Its my understanding that defense attny or Pros. for that matter..can NOT Subborn perjury..in other words since their words is NOT testimony they can say whatever they want..speculate, suggest etc..SO as I have witnessed many many trials suggesting all sorts of things ( Take Cayley Case as an example)..HOWEVER, they can cannot put someone on the stand to state something they KNOW is false or a LIE..AND if proven as such..either one of the lawyers can be lose their license and be in BIG Do DO..
Its also IIRC that is precisely why Def. Attny do not want to know if their client is guilty or not..No confessions so to speak..as it really curtails their defense..They can suggest all they wish, and attempt to discredit Pros. witnesses ( which is mostly their focus in trials) as IF they indeed have solid proof then it would never come to trial in the first place......
JMOO on that point you are making :seeya:
I do wonder if BW is the BW from Dragon's Den.
It is.
I am not suggesting that Nancy did this (and don't think that she did), but as something of a public service announcement, I'll point out that you can't really tell that a spouse is having an affair from phone records. Why? One of the common tools of the person having an affair is a second "secret" cell phone that their spouse does not know about. Often it is done with prepaid phones (Tracfone, etc) because they require no contracts and the minutes can be purchased with cash. So, no records.3) IF Nancy had indeed had an ongoing Relationship..All phone logs have been obtained from providers..so maybe not texts but all ###'s right?. I am sure all those people connected with those ### were contacted and either had alibi's or were no where near the scene
In fact, I have yet to make up my mind and the day that this trial comes to a close I could as easily feel that he is guilty as he is innocent. What you fail to see is that most of the posters that you accuse of supporting BC are doing no such thing. We are merely supporting the idea that a person is innocent until found guilty and refuse to allow the prosecution to skirt their responsibility to provide proof beyond a reasonable doubt because that is our civic duty.
I'm sorry but dirty moves??? :waitasec: The prosecution can not discredit "good" testimony. If it was good, it would stand up to cross examination.
I seem to recall that the BW that NC knew was in the oil business?
That isn't the *only* evidence they had. Teddy Bear is a detective, he observed Brad's lies, 'we are working on our marriage', 'I cleaned the house all day today, to make Nancy happy'. As Teddy said 'if this is what a house looks like *clean*, lord save us.' Well, he didn't exactly say those words, but you know that's what he meant. He had a guy who wouldn't come down to the station to give a statement, who never inquired as to what they were doing to find his wife. Now I don't know how many of the ABB'ers are 'regular' crime buffs and how many are just here for this case, but those of us who have been reading crime for decades, have 'hinky meters', much like the Detective. This isn't his first case, his first suspect. Just like for most of us, this isn't our first 'dead wife' case. Hinky meters go off, things set them off. Brad set's off hinky meters, LOUDLY. MOO
Wanted to add, much like Ann Miller Konce set off my hinky meter.
Thanks! That's what I thought. I may be the only one but I find that interesting. I wonder what information if any will come out about him.
Thanks! That's what I thought. I may be the only one but I find that interesting. I wonder what information if any will come out about him.
He was divorced in 2001.
I think that the right way to say it is that she was Facebook friends with them. I think that the end of that was mostly concurrent with the prosecution deciding to put people's FB pages in play. :waitasec:AL is apparently Facebook friends with several of the prosecution witnesses. And the day that I stopped into court I sat in the back and noticed that when Mr. Rentz walked into the courtroom for the start of the day he stopped by the room where AL sits and had a friendly conversation with her. I agree that WRAL should not have her reporting on this case.