I would not call a 4 year old an accomplice. I know that you have seen it stated many times that at the age of four, a child can call a phone number. Since there was a 4 year old in the house, there is no way of knowing if Nancy was there to make that call or if the child was directed to call. And before you say that it would be too risky to involve a 4 year old, it is much riskier to commit murder. MOO
I do think that if LE had an interview with the 4 yo, depending on her personality and maturity would likely have been able to say 'something' ie. I woke up, noone was home, or I answered the phone. Or even, 'my mom was sick' My grandbabies are all 4...one very precosious, one smart as whip, nothing gets by him and the other willing to tell you everything and anything that goes on in her house and usually it is not the correct version, just a 4 yo verson. I really don't think she answered the phone. I do think she saw her mother in running clothes, but honestly..she is 4 time is a nonconcept. 4 weeks ago could be yesterday for some. Again it would depend on the child.
I don't think she had anything of value or at least anything that wouldn't come into question. I honestly don't believe she saw or heard anything from that day/morning. I have waivered back and forth in what I believe *probably* happened that morning. I am more of the mind that BC stating that he and NC were up with one of the children at 4 am is probably closer to when the events occured. I don't think they were up with the children.
Kelly