call me crazy but i am one of the conspiracy theorists when it comes to this case. there are child sex rings prevalant in the colorado area.
i think jon benet was being molested by the Ramsey's high powered friends. i think her parents allowed it. the fact patsy came to the door to police in the same clothes as the night before tell me she was up all night, the redressing of underpants, the fibers on the tape being patsys, the way patsy flug herself on the JonBenets body to contaminate evidence, the randsom note, the golf bag that Jr had to have that was never checked, the possible 3rd person in the house ect all lead me to believe the Ramsey's had brought JonBenet home Christmas eve to be molested. did the molester kill her for making noise or for the fact she was old enough to speak out? were her parents angry and surprised their daughter had been killed and had to go into coverup mode to protect the molester and their knowledge or did they understand it "had to be done"
JonBenet's bed wetting and multiple trips to peditrician some with vaginal checkups are signs of possible sexual abuse.
i cant get past the bizarre randsom note that patsy could not have been excluded from. this family knew something and knowledge in my mind leads to involvement.
erinleigh,
This is entirely possible, and is one of my theories, which includes the extended family, and a non-family member e.g. a high powered friend.i think jon benet was being molested by the Ramsey's high powered friends.
Prima facie we have a conspiracy and crime-scene staging. The latter suggests family involvement and the former that of the authorities with family friends cutting deals and doing favors etc.
On the abuse Coroner Meyer has been quoted:
http://www.acandyrose.com/01301997warrant.htm
Detective Arndt told Your Affiant that she witnessed the autopsy of JonBenet Ramsey which was conducted by Dr. John Meyer on December 26, 1996. Detective Arndt told Your Affiant that she observed Dr. Meyer examine the vaginal area of the victim and heard him state that the victim had received an injury consistent with digital penetration of her vagina. Detective Arndt told Your Affiant that Dr. Meyer told her that is was his opinion that the victim had been subjected to sexual contact.
Now it could be argued that aspects of JonBenet's genital injuries were consistent with staging and not acute assault, but there is also evidence of chronic abuse including the red flags you cite e.g. bed-wetting, pediatric visits etc. So it does appear someone was abusing JonBenet on a regular basis.
Even if there were no ring there does appear to have been a conspiracy. All these people know that JonBenet was abused, but they have assisted in the cover up. So its not as if its the usual form of local corrupt politics involving land deals, planning applications for shopping malls, and condominiums etc. The conspirators know that JonBenet was being sexually molested and they colluded to bury the evidence!
Just consider the phone records are unavailable. Did John call Lockheed Martin to report a kidnapping, or did he negelect that so to avoid the FBI making an appearance? Why was the governor of Colorado phoned?
Or why would the Stines be willing to impersonate the Chief of Police via email, with the intention of influencing the public perception of the case, particularly when John Ramsey has stated he does not consider them to be friends.
I reckon its possible that some third party was either present or turned up at the Ramsey house to assist in the cover up and staging, alternatively advice was offered by phone.
This possibility follows from Patsy being ignorant of some aspects of the staging e.g. the size-12 Bloomgindales,
I used to think that was Ramsey speak, but I'm inclined to believe that Patsy only knew when one of the tabloids splashed it.Q. (By Mr. Levin) Well, let's start with what - I will make it very simple for you, Mrs. Ramsey. What information are you in possession of or what do you know about the underwear that your daughter was wearing at the time she was found murdered?
A. I have heard that she had on a pair of Bloomi's that said Wednesday on them.
Q. The underwear that she was wearing, that is Bloomi's panties, do you know where they come from as far as what store?
A. Bloomingdales in New York.
Q. Who purchased those?
A. I did.
Q. Do you recall when you purchased them?
A. It was, I think, November of '96.
I reckon this is supporting evidence of further crime-scene staging, why or when I am not sure, but it does appear to have occured. The when may have been when the Third Party offered advice or even took part, as per the wiped flashlight, or it might be when Fleet White drove Burke to his house, leaving John with few eyeballs on him?
I forget now but did Pam have a written/typed shopping list of items to retrieve from the Ramsey house, when and from whom did she recieve her instructions?
So you have conspiracy and crime-scene staging all in place even before the first policeman knocks at the Ramsey door that fateful morning.
So applying occam BDI appears to be the simplest explanation that clarifies the early involvement of the authorities, the early legal representation, the call to the governor, the non-involvement of the FBI, the constructive collusion of the parents and extended family.
.