Sorry my post was in response to hybane
My post was about the location of the shops.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sorry my post was in response to hybane
Yeah maybe VR still has some interest in a boat or two
Thanks for the pdf advise..Ill have a look next time. Have real trouble working out stuff on this ipad.....like copying and pasting etc..
Motivation ........ makes me think of the Denis and Laurie Tanner case
I'm. Really offended by this! What's ur point that Avondale heights is not middle class??? I live here & take offence to the notion that we can't afford designer labels!!
A line of inquiry that has to be looked at. Goes back to initial thoughts on family members.
My thinking this has more credence than AR's involvement.
Yes I think AR is just a complete contradiction in himself that's why I don't take much of what he says as fact.
Yes but he said it all over The Australian. It makes me wonder who else he told, in more detail, before Karen disappeared and after, as he said, he told his 'cowerd' father who wouldn't do anything about the alleged 'family dysfunction'?
For me this goes back to the business Warrant Brand owned by the two brothers. In which i have posted in both first and second threads.
After this split, business wise VR goes off in another direction. I would be looking into the personal relationship between, BR and VR after this point.
Blue Laser Jeans ?
Didn't AR also say that he was not going to detail the 'family secret' until later on, in one months time I believe, yet he has plastered it in public on SM.
For me this goes back to the business Warrant Brand owned by the two brothers. In which i have posted in both first and second threads.
After this split, business wise VR goes off in another direction. I would be looking into the personal relationship between, BR and VR after this point.
Yes, I think the euphemisms being used for his 'secret' allegations in The Australian are 'family secret' or 'family dysfunction'. Their lawyers wouldn't let them print what has been stated on SM for fear of incurring a hefty lawsuit if they turn out to be false. A defamation case could be brought against AR solely based on those I believe (although I'm not a lawyer) if, of course, Karen has 'run off' as he now says he thinks she has and subsequently returns. The 'month' timeframe may be necessary for programming purposes for an appearance on '60 Minutes' or the like.
Love the 60 minutes angle, I would think it would be difficult to prove such historical accusations without some form of collaborating evidence otherwise it just becomes 'he said she said'.
And when she is not around to say, it becomes 'he said he said'. Even worse.
Love the 60 minutes angle, I would think it would be difficult to prove such historical accusations without some form of collaborating evidence otherwise it just becomes 'he said she said'.
And when she is not around to say, it becomes 'he said he said'. Even worse.
And when she is not around to say, it becomes 'he said he said'. Even worse.
good point
:clap: :clap: :clap::floorlaugh: