SouthAussie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2012
- Messages
- 30,310
- Reaction score
- 186,393
Also, is theft of a car called Unlawful Use of a Motor Vehicle in Qld, I wonder. Unusual terminology.
Also, is theft of a car called Unlawful Use of a Motor Vehicle in Qld, I wonder.
Could the subsequent insurance payout on the theft of the car be payment of "the debt:?How does that work? It obviously means that Sam took the blame for something. Does it mean that the car and collection theft was an inside job and police know it?
I took it that home invasion and theft was all one thing. They put his designer gear in the back of the car, and when the car was located the gear wasn't there. That's all I know.Not sure. Could be fraud in the police report. Could be fraud in an insurance claim (though wouldn't they just refuse the claim - not sure that insurance companies go around chasing every dodgy claim, unless they have done a big payout). Could be completely unrelated and just interesting timing.
When did police find Sam's car? It could be related to that theft on the police report imo.
Was the car stolen at the same time as the home invasion? Will have to go read up more on the home invasion.
Not sure. Could be fraud in the police report. Could be fraud in an insurance claim (though wouldn't they just refuse the claim - not sure that insurance companies go around chasing every dodgy claim, unless they have done a big payout). Could be completely unrelated and just interesting timing.
When did police find Sam's car? It could be related to that theft on the police report imo.
Was the car stolen at the same time as the home invasion? Will have to go read up more on the home invasion.
Could the subsequent insurance payout on the theft of the car be payment of "the debt:?
Sent from my GT-I9205 using Tapatalk
Could the subsequent insurance payout on the theft of the car be payment of "the debt:?
Sent from my GT-I9205 using Tapatalk
So that suggests they all moved out and started renting it out in Oct, after the break-in in Sept.....
Could the subsequent insurance payout on the theft of the car be payment of "the debt:?
Sent from my GT-I9205 using Tapatalk
Could the subsequent insurance payout on the theft of the car be payment of "the debt:?
Sent from my GT-I9205 using Tapatalk
I just looked up the address and it was listed for rent on the 15th of September 2016, 2 weeks after the home invasion
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
True, but the alleged perps (many mistakes made to date) thought if it was missing for only a short time the insurance would be forthcomingBut Sam's car was found, so there wouldn't have been an insurance payout.
If the house was rented out in Oct 2016, as suggested above, then the fraud could be the new tenant.
True, but the alleged perps (many mistakes made to date) thought if it was missing for only a short time the insurance would be forthcoming
Sent from my GT-I9205 using Tapatalk
IMO, whoever stole Sam's car wouldn't have been able to sell it. You have to have the correct paperwork to the RTA and have signed the vehicle over to the new owner to sell or drive otherwise you can't get it registered.
I find the fraud entry interesting. Two months after a home invasion and theft of a car.
Perhaps this is why Sam didn't 'fall out' with RB.
Would like to know where exactly it was found, we know at a unit complex near to rb's but was it secreted away or in the visitors car park for every passerby to see?They could have burned it. Insurance would then pay out. Instead they parked it near their house. Maybe for a repaint job later, to be reused by the owner?
Doesn't have to be sold. Just needs to be gone, and not found.
How long does it take an insurance Co. to pay out? There would of been a police investigation/report into the theft as well.