GJ had received approval to place a listening device on the FP’s car before they were ruled out, it’s highly likely it was approved again. WA’s cops received worldwide praise for their handling of CS’s investigation, it was a good incentive for NSWPOL to gain back public approval with WT’s investigation with a new focus on the FPs, FM was named as a POI, an approval would be guaranteed, imo.
The listening devices at PS’s house were approved by a magistrate for surveillance for a specific time, but the warrant had expired when GJ recorded a further four interactions with PS, this needs to stated because it’s misleading otherwise.
I don’t agree there needs to be a very strong case for a listening device to be used, if the police state their reasons to a magistrate, why would they disallow it, they’ve got nothing to work on but what’s put before them unless it obviously appears to be frivolous, which SFR is not under any circumstances.
JMO
Gary Jubelin, who headed the police investigation for four years, says William Tyrrell's foster-parents were interrogated and placed under a covert operation that involved placing a listening device in their car before being ruled out as suspects.
www.abc.net.au