Why has no one come forward via MSM to confirm or deny that Bill & Margaret Spedding were at the school play that morning?
Welcome Samantha10. It could be a simple case of these people being interviewed by police and they are not at liberty to discuss it any further.
As has already been discussed in past threads, the amount of media blackout in this case is huge, and the level of co-operation between MSM & LE has never been seen in any other case in Australia. We surmised it is for the protection of the FF, were even told as much, and fair enough too.
But why haven't MSM rounded up every Tom, Dick and Harry from the town who may have something to say about it - parents from the school, people from the cafe, other customers of the repairman, people who were walking down the street. It is what they normally do - they just love getting that scoop, accompanied by the "breaking news/eyewitness talks/newsflash/exclusive/you saw it here first folks" 30 second news byte to entice TV watchers in.
Now I believe, and I could be wrong here, that if people have just been spoken to at large, without being formally ID'ed as witnesses, with official statements taken as such, then it is pretty much free reign. They can't be ordered, legally, by police, to not talk, but they can be asked not to. Which is why we often see minor players in stories being interviewed on TV. But where are they in this case? They are individuals, each with their own beliefs and moral codes - there are always those who just love to be at the centre of the universe. Not all of them can be controlled all the time.
MSM as an entity is far easier to control than a bunch of individuals. The question is why?
MSM reported the neighbours interviews in the early days, then it all just stopped. What
have we seen since then? What
haven't we seen? At what point did that MSM stream stop? They are rhetorical questions.
Here's another one to ask ourselves. If the blackout in the early days was to protect the FF, as we were told, and fair enough too, then who, or more importantly,
what information, are they now protecting by not reporting on everything else? What else is at play here, and why?
Sleuthing this case is like playing solitaire with cards missing. But when you stop and ask yourself those rhetorical questions, there are only a few logical conclusions to arrive at.