I think it's only safe to discuss what's been reported in the media. Anything else might get the thread shut down. I'd like for the thread to stay open...
As for inconsistencies, possibly something came up when police were appealing for the owners of cars captured by the Kendall Tennis Club CCTV footage?
bbm.....yes that and what the heck is at Lake Cathie that had to be done in tandem w/the searches?
Maybe they thought WT was actually there and they were concerned that whoever they suspect might've made a run for it with WT in custody, it's a hell of a lot easier for a helicopter to have eyes on a car on the run.Yeah, I was confused by the helicopter at the time and Lake Cathie is right by Bonny Hills so it could've just seemed like it was above Lake Cathie. I don't understand why it was necessary, though. It seems overkill. My first thought was that they wanted to attract attention, like make it a highly visible raid? Or were they looking for a car of interest that might be taking off? You can imagine when it was on the news that morning people would be panicking if they were involved.
Does anyone know the reason for police helicopters in raids? I had a quick look at Google and it said the recent terrorism raids in Sydney were captured on aerial footage by a police helicopter. Is that their purpose? To get footage?
That's what I am clicking on but it just won't load :\ the page opens and that's as far as it goes. I will try again later I guess
What does 'bbm' mean?
Detectives, including homicide detectives from Sydney, spent much of today searching a unit above some shops in Laurieton.
An employee of a shop underneath told Fairfax forensic officers had taken several items from the scene.
He said he believed a man and a woman lived in the unit but said he had never seen anyone in the office space where police had focused their investigations.
Read more at http://www.9news.com.au/national/20...-in-william-tyrell-search#zKHh4ioAhzUHJtPH.99
BBM. So we are talking about 2 separate spaces, the office, and the unit. The unit apparently according to the witness used by a man and a woman, with a mattress? I doubt BS and MS would be staying there, so who could be. Family member? Are the two properties rented by the same person? I feel like the police are excluding some critical information about the search, evidence, and potential POI/POI's.
Imo. I cannot see them taking one mattress and leaving another. . Surely that would be a big error on their part if this was the case.The police took a single mattress away. That doesn't mean it was the only mattress in the unit. Quite possible a double for the man and woman in the unit as well is what I'm thinking.
I just wanted to bump this post from Amee back in Thread 2, as it may have some significance (BBM). Unfortunately, the Australian article is now subscriber only - though it wasn't at the time.
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sh...-NSW-12th-Sept-2014-2&p=10987443#post10987443
I was actually looking for an old post about the police having contacted known sex offenders, but there was one they couldn't find. I am almost positive that I read that here quite a while ago. But I can't find the post. :sigh:
That's interesting, the scene I imagined was just an old mattress being laid out in the back of an office. Impromptu.
I feel like the police are excluding some critical information about the search, evidence, and potential POI/POI's.