frogwell
Former Member
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2015
- Messages
- 2,147
- Reaction score
- 3,001
I can think of one maybe two named POI's who would probably fit one of the above patterns, but whether they can be placed at the scene on the day in question is another matter. Roll on inquest. It is interesting/frightening that probably 10's to a hundred could fit the above description who may have been in the vicinity, but it really only obviously comes down to a few in the end when certain factors are eliminated, e.g. the Daniel Morcombe case. Of these named POI's, I would still be more likely to look at a child retrieval network with the other associations and information we have of other people involved in this case. Which gives me small hope that the motivations for taking WT were not sexual and that he may be alive somewhere. IMOWhen looking at clinical studies into the nature of adults offending against children - and when I consider the position that William was briefly in on the fateful day - I can completely see why this is thought to be an opportunistic crime.
Situational offences
Their offending is often impulsive and opportunistic.
The regressed pattern of behaviour ... Children are chosen due to their availability.
The morally indiscriminate pattern of behaviour .... Victims are chosen due to vulnerability and opportunity. These offences were characterised by stranger victims, outdoor offences, one-off offences .....
Those who engage in the inadequate behaviour pattern .... targets them because he finds them to be non-threatening.
Indeed, some offenders can be envisaged in the middle of this continuum with a preferential ... interest in children as well as an awareness of situational opportunities to offend.
Differentiating child sexual abusers | APS
(I have excluded some words in this text due to the upsetting nature of the subject, but the possibility of this being why William disappeared is very real)