heidisams
Member
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2011
- Messages
- 743
- Reaction score
- 41
How anyone can believe that this wasn't a Murder 1 case I'll never understand. A baby doesn't walk off to dump herself in a swamp, duct taped and double bagged!!!!!!!!!!!!! I hope Baez sees Caylee's precious face every night when he closes his eyes to sleep.
Poor sweet baby.
Agreed! It seems those that refuse to accept fca's guilt do so by looking at the evidence in bits and pieces, and refuse to acknowledge the evidence in its totality. The evidence shows that the molestation, drowning, and subsequent "compartmentalization" fca experienced during the 31 days did not happen. Caylee was murdered. Period. Hanger-oners should ask themselves: Why hasn't anyone, including fca, her attorneys, prosecutors, ca/la, doctors who examined her (required by law to report valid reports of molestation), etc, pushed to have george prosecuted for molestation, or any involvement in Caylee's murder/cover up? George was accused of the most serious crimes, yet he's never even been investigated, or suspected, of any of them because the EVIDENCE proves casey was the sole person who killed, disposed of, and tried to cover up the murder of Caylee. Not george...and they all know it... And for those who believe fca was lying (ugly coping) due to compartmentalization during the 31 days, why does the evidence show that this pattern of lying was just normal behavior for her, shown long before the 31 days - all the way up to present day? She was making up jobs and lying to babysitters, and using an array of excuses related to a nanny, since Caylee was born. She's still making up lies about the nanny today! And as for the theory that she was able to party for 31 days because she buried her grief, I don't know of one single instance, either in the form of a report or with my own eyes, of fca showing any grief or remorse over the death of Caylee before or after those 31 days either. How do you explain her NEVER showing grief? She sure wasn't grieving in all the jailhouse recordings, visits, or at trial. On the contrary, she was cold and callous when discussing Caylee. At the trial, when the jury was out, she looked at the video of Caylee (with duct tape super imposed) with anger and disgust, but acted as if she just couldn't even bare to look at it when they were present. Only one reason for that, she was never sad about her death. She played up the grief for the jurors. When they were out she was often giddy and flirtatious. She enjoyed all the attention and the cameras, but knew how to flip the switch when the jurors entered that courtroom. We saw it with our own eyes, how do you explain that away? She would go from distraught, swaddled in the arms of her babysitter attorney, to winking and practically high-fiving everyone at the defense table... The girl was much more concerned about her hair and clothing than she was about her baby's death, that's the cold hard truth... And doesn't the fact that fca REFUSES to speak about Caylee until she gets paid tell them all they need to know about her grief?... A grieving mother doesn't require millions of $$$ to talk about her baby...There is evidence of her guilt littered throughout this case... that's not based on speculation, or whatever it is they constantly accuse us of doing...being influenced by the media, or having a lynch mob mentality...etc... We are outraged because the evidence shows casey is guilty, and we refuse to let Caylee be forgotten.
One more point I've just really wanted to make, RNamey believed fca was afraid of threats by ga about the draconian Florida laws for neglect and that's why she didn't say anything about the drowning. I really can't figure that one out, because if that were the case then one would have to believe that when she was charged with 1st degree murder and faced the death penalty, she was more afraid of this dreadful little neglect charge than she was of a capital murder charge... How do you justify her fears, threats by ga of neglect charges vs threats by the State of Florida of death? No one in their right mind would stay mum about an accidental drowning for 3 years when facing murder/death penalty! No way. That will never make sense to me... And how do you believe the neglect threat/drowning happened and also believe that the foolproof suffocation search shows her guilt???...
All jmo.