update on the appeal:
"The public defender’s office is working on Cooper’s appeal. Kurtz said he is not involved in work on Cooper’s appeal at this time." [ARTICLE LINK]
Some other interesting excerpts from the article which mainly discusses the computer evidence:
"The nature of the timestamps suggests that someone after that period had tried to backdate the timestamps, says Kurtz."
This is an element of the theory that BC had had indeed google-mapped the dump site, but only after receiving the news of NC body recovery and location.
“There’s no way possible to have the same first-time-created and last-accessed timestamp down to the microsecond. That’s the difference between artifact and artwork. That’s artwork.” (Kurtz quote)
"The public defender’s office is working on Cooper’s appeal. Kurtz said he is not involved in work on Cooper’s appeal at this time." [ARTICLE LINK]
Some other interesting excerpts from the article which mainly discusses the computer evidence:
"The nature of the timestamps suggests that someone after that period had tried to backdate the timestamps, says Kurtz."
This is an element of the theory that BC had had indeed google-mapped the dump site, but only after receiving the news of NC body recovery and location.
“There’s no way possible to have the same first-time-created and last-accessed timestamp down to the microsecond. That’s the difference between artifact and artwork. That’s artwork.” (Kurtz quote)