Guess you forgot the bug man and her friends saw the condition of the house many times.
Yes, but that means both of them didn't clean, not just him. Are we to believe that neither of them ever cleaned the house?
Guess you forgot the bug man and her friends saw the condition of the house many times.
Yes, but that means both of them didn't clean, not just him. Are we to believe that neither of them ever cleaned the house?
Thanks for the comments. I don't feel hesitant to join into the discussions, but it did and still bothers me how many "Hang BC at sunrise" folks are here.
The sworn evidence is only coming from whatever NC told her friends though. They weren't in that house every day.
I'm not saying it's not true, but it's based on hearsay.
I'm not saying Nancy never cleaned house.
I'm just saying the evidence says Brad very rarely did anything to help.
But the only evidence you have is what her friends are saying. Of course they are going to say he never cleaned, they are trying to paint him in the most negative light possible.
Here's a scenario for you. Currently, me and my wife share the cleaning responsibilities in my house. My wife's friends have never physically observed me clean anything. Therefore, according to them, my wife could theoretically tell them I don't do nothing.
See what I did there?
You think her friends are lying about their own observations?
You think Nancy lied to multiple friends about Brad being a slob?
You think the bug man lied?
Sorry, but your hypothetical doesn't hold water in this case.
Exactly, plus we have not heard from one defense witness yet. DD did say she saw BC out washing his car at times and doing yard work.
You think her friends are lying about their own observations?
You think Nancy lied to multiple friends about Brad being a slob?
You think the bug man lied?
Sorry, but your hypothetical doesn't hold water in this case.
But the only evidence you have is what her friends are saying. Of course they are going to say he never cleaned, they are trying to paint him in the most negative light possible.
Here's a scenario for you. Currently, me and my wife share the cleaning responsibilities in my house. My wife's friends have never physically observed me clean anything. Therefore, according to them, my wife could theoretically tell them I don't do nothing.
See what I did there?
What if a defense witness testifies that they have observed Brad clean the house?
I think NC embellished her stories to her friends (they have admitted this already).
The bug man didn't lie, but I don't see how that proves that Nancy cleans and Brad doesn't. To me it shows they both don't clean.
If the defense has a witness that saw - or heard Brad talk about- Brad cleaning floors...bring him on.
You think her friends are lying about their own observations?
You think Nancy lied to multiple friends about Brad being a slob?
You think the bug man lied?
Sorry, but your hypothetical doesn't hold water in this case.
So you need proof that he cleaned his floors to prove he didn't commit this crime? People don't typically discuss these things, do they? It seems silly to have to prove one cleaned floors at any given time.
Speaking of entertaining, it is in Mike Hiller's deposition that they had plans to go to the Cooper's Saturday evening. Maybe that is why he felt the house needed cleaned.
Not what Brad said.So you need proof that he cleaned his floors to prove he didn't commit this crime? People don't typically discuss these things, do they? It seems silly to have to prove one cleaned floors at any given time.
Speaking of entertaining, it is in Mike Hiller's deposition that they had plans to go to the Cooper's Saturday evening. Maybe that is why he felt the house needed cleaned.
Not me.
The jury will consider testimony and make their own minds up about all the evidence. Will they believe the state and their witnesses, that Brad was not known to do household cleaning? Or will they believe it was not unusual for him to be hand washing the floors?
Just a small piece to consider in this laboring trial.
Not what Brad said.
He said he washed the floors on that Saturday AM because Nancy was upset they were not done when she returned from vacation.
So you need proof that he cleaned his floors to prove he didn't commit this crime? People don't typically discuss these things, do they? It seems silly to have to prove one cleaned floors at any given time.
Speaking of entertaining, it is in Mike Hiller's deposition that they had plans to go to the Cooper's Saturday evening. Maybe that is why he felt the house needed cleaned.
That is splitting hairs a little. The floor needed cleaned, he had not done it, they were having people over.....