sorrell skye
Former Member
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2009
- Messages
- 6,684
- Reaction score
- 7,007
That she was murdered, and was never there to begin with.
Is this based on evidence?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That she was murdered, and was never there to begin with.
Is this based on evidence?
PAhahahaha.So you genuinely believe that Barbara is out there in the desert, sustaining herself off of some oasis of puddle water?
I find it comical that members support or reject the info that has been provided, based on whose narrative they wish to believe.
This!!!Well, one glaring problem is that our VI got that information from RT.
MOO
This!!!
I’m not the one hinging my opinion on hope.
If she was out there, she almost certainly would have been found by now.
Logic trumps wishful thinking.
And what do you mean by “who is telling Barbara’s story?”
The investigators are trying to do just that.
I find it comical that members support or reject the info that has been provided, based on whose narrative they wish to believe.
Here's the thing: Barbara needs to be heard.
Who is telling Barbara's story?
I don’t care what anyone else does.Oh - so unless LE verifies information, I shouldn't take anything at face value?
Geez - I think that's the same stance that those of us who have been sober-minded have taken for the past days.
BBM:
This is by far the most compelling fact that to me points toward foul play.
If she was out there, the overwhelming likelihood is that she would have been found.
Search teams. Dogs. Helicopters. Hours, days, spent in an exhaustive, thorough search effort.
What was the end result of these efforts? Nothing.
Not only did they not find BT, they didn't find one single trace of her.
Not a single strand of hair. Not a single thread from her hat. Not a single boot print.
What is the logical conclusion that can be drawn from this?
If anyone tries to argue that the logical conclusion here is that she's out there in that location, I'm going to go ahead and change my name to Alice, cause I'll know I'm officially arrived in Wonderland.
JMO.
BBM:
This is by far the most compelling fact that to me points toward foul play.
If she was out there, the overwhelming likelihood is that she would have been found.
Search teams. Dogs. Helicopters. Hours, days, spent in an exhaustive, thorough search effort.
What was the end result of these efforts? Nothing.
Not only did they not find BT, they didn't find one single trace of her.
Not a single strand of hair. Not a single thread from her hat. Not a single boot print.
What is the logical inference that can be drawn from this?
If anyone tries to argue that the logical inference here is that she's out there in that location, I'm going to go ahead and change my name to Alice, cause I'll know I've officially arrived in Wonderland.
JMO.
I don’t think that we know nearly as much about what LE did or didn’t find as you’re saying we know.
That's the difference between us then.
Just because something is the most probable doesn't mean it's what actually happened.
I need more information before going towards a single direction in this case. JMO
What signs would have to be found at the scene if Barbara was abducted?
So, you think LE's public statements that they found no trace of her are obfuscation on their part?
What would be the potential advantage in LE withholding info that they had found traces of her out there and were tracking those leads?
Not true, sorry. There wouldn't be any deceased missing people out there, if this was the case.