Then does RT have NO representation with a lawyer anymore, or is it that particular lawyer is no longer representing him - ?
If no representation then, yes: must be a reason for that.
I'd sure like to know what constitutes 'no evidence' of BT & like to know why they do not suspect foul play-?
We here know all the avenues to be pursued: it takes time. LE made these statements fairly early on
If this is so: those two possibilities are vetted & off the table: that leaves BT having gotten
lost, & she's out there
My point here: I'm afraid LE has washed their hands of BT. If so, I can only trust with good reason
And if that IS the case: that leaves LE with the assumption she, no abduction, no foul play, got lost, & is out there.
These thoughts all follow the knowledge that RT doesn't have a lawyer any longer (again: unless the lawyer who is representing him has changed.....?)
Who knows, then, when or if, she'll be found
JMO