borndem
Anglophile & registered demwit
- Joined
- May 15, 2010
- Messages
- 19,449
- Reaction score
- 51,574
I am quoting my own post since it seems this one is the one RUK has problems with.
My posts are always my personal opinions as noted.
I meant, IMO, any reasonable and logical juror is not going to give a pass to a murder suspect simply because they say the victim may have tried to kiss them or may have said something to others they didn't like. I have been 'hit on', groped, assaulted, and had three attempted rapes during my lifetime. Even at my age now, I have had two sex stalkers on FB yet not one person was harmed by me and certainly not murdered nor will they ever be.
>>>>> respectfully snipped for space <<<<<<
SW can use any defense he wants, but IMOO attacking/repeatedly stabbing, and murdering a victim much smaller than him shows SW had no reason to feel threatened by Blaze at any time or even fear him in the first place. I honestly don't even see a viable defense for this case but that is JMO. Blaze was unarmed. The murderer had a deadly weapon with him and used it to murder. SW outweighed the victim by 50 pounds and was much taller and we certainly know he was much meaner since he murdered Blaze in such a cruel manner. IMO
Agree with all of it, ocean. Also I would add that SW, who dropped out of college after one year (I'd like to know why), and I'm betting that BB excelled at their arts HS, was prolly also motivated by sheer jealousy and revenge for that. Yes, hate crime (but not for the jealousy part). JMO