I don't think she helped him. However, he was alleged to have spend considerable time at the crime scenes. I am very curious to know how he explained his many absences to his wife, and if she happened to notice that crimes were taking place on the nights that her husband went out in the middle of the night. Maybe he told her that he had insomnia, and needed to go for a drive to get back to sleep. Maybe he told her that he had to fill in for someone on the third shift who called in sick. Who knows... I wonder if she will allow herself to be interviewed at some point.
:cow:
I agree. Since he compartmentalized, so completely, his life, a wife might ......MIGHT have known nothing of his activities. ( other than she maybe perceived that he was deceitful, perhaps having affairs, as other Posters have written.)
GSK might never have brought his "crime toolbox" home with him (for example: weapons, dog repellent, "trophies", etc.). He probably had self-storage facilities, lockers, or storage sheds, etc. somewhere, up and down those highways and/or canals, he frequented. GSK may have locked up all his criminal-activity-belongings in other residences, even, throughout Northern, and then, Southern California (esp. those missing years between his years of employment that we know of.)
Whom did he do business with, during those years? Do those people, acquaintances, associates, business partners know the locations of any of his "workshops", his real-estate, ...along the way, ... which GSK might have owned/rented?
As many on this forum have stated: There should be justice for every one of those victims. It is good the "lid is off" of this now. So, the REAL investigative process has begun.
LE can now follow up on any alias' names which GSK might have used, (or, his own real name, in different locales.) They can figure out where those storage facilities are, if they exist. (esp. in Southern CA., when he supposedly visited family at times). And what about the boats he had over the years? Are there other boats that are moored, somewhere, or, in dry-dock, under his name, or a pseudonym? There has to be a lot of evidence somewhere, even if it is hidden away,........ very smartly.
Hopefully, LE can sort it all out, and trace GSK's movements over those long time periods.