Orville Butch
Member
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2017
- Messages
- 107
- Reaction score
- 19
its a big state and this was multi jurisdictional. also, this was before www.
But this has been an open case for so long. It was suggested repeatedly that this guy was cop.
its a big state and this was multi jurisdictional. also, this was before www.
He shoplifted a can of dog repellent and this wasn't a red flag to other officers?
This guy was married more than once it seems.
So you want DNA from non offending police officers but not non violent drug offenders? Seems irrational given the statistics on who is more likely to be a violent murderer....and he killed most of the people (we know about anyway) after he was fired.
Bronk how are you not taking this in? I'll put it in capital letters, HE DID NOT BUY THESE ITEMS, HE ATTEMPTED TO STEAL THEM.
If that's not a red flag from a serving police officer, I don't know what is. If he wanted them for any law abiding purpose, or even any mildly illegal purpose, he would have just walked up to the cash register with them. The fact that he was prepared to run the risk of being caught shoplifting rather than have those purchases on record is the salient point here, not the items themselves.
Who is the East Side Rapist?
http://www.sacbee.com/news/local/crime/article209823959.html
DeAngelo graduated from Folsom High School in June 1964 before enlisting in the U.S. Navy and going to fight in Vietnam, according to newspaper clippings. After returning from the war, he earned an associate's degree in police science from Sierra College and a bachelor's degree in criminal justice with a focus on criminal law from Sacramento State. He then interned with the Roseville Police Department for a short period of time before moving south.
DeAngelo worked as a police officer in Exeter, a city about 10 miles from Visalia, from 1973 to 1976 [many homes ransacked, and a murder —- connected?]
officer with the Auburn Police Department from 1976, when he is believed to have committed his first rape, until his termination in 1979
Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/news/local/crime/article209823959.html#storylink=cpy
So you want DNA from non offending police officers but not non violent drug offenders? Seems irrational given the statistics on who is more likely to be a violent murderer....and he killed most of the people (we know about anyway) after he was fired.
Bronk how are you not taking this in? I'll put it in capital letters, HE DID NOT BUY THESE ITEMS, HE ATTEMPTED TO STEAL THEM.
If that's not a red flag from a serving police officer, I don't know what is. If he wanted them for any law abiding purpose, or even any mildly illegal purpose, he would have just walked up to the cash register with them. The fact that he was prepared to run the risk of being caught shoplifting rather than have those purchases on record is the salient point here, not the items themselves.
yes, the stealing is odd...but I'm not seeing smoking gun or red flag in the faceBronk how are you not taking this in? I'll put it in capital letters, HE DID NOT BUY THESE ITEMS, HE ATTEMPTED TO STEAL THEM.
If that's not a red flag from a serving police officer, I don't know what is. If he wanted them for any law abiding purpose, or even any mildly illegal purpose, he would have just walked up to the cash register with them. The fact that he was prepared to run the risk of being caught shoplifting rather than have those purchases on record is the salient point here, not the items themselves.
You bring up a decent point but I think you are unaware of how many people steal because of the thrill, it doesnt have much to do with not being able to afford anything. I know personally know wealthy people who have stolen random items from stores
For most of the same reasons why not everyone DNA would be on fileWhy wouldn't all police DNA be on file? (obviously his wouldn't as like you said he was fired in 79)
yes, the stealing is odd...but I'm not seeing smoking gun or red flag in the face
other people use repellent
well off people shop lift:
http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-16469928
hindsight is 20-20 here
is it suspicious?? sure...red flag--no
and from the initial post on this--I doubt the investigators for the murders even saw his record...did they?
Michelle McNamera, "Letter to the Golden State Killer," THE NEW YORKER 10 Jan 2018.[FONT="][B]Save[/B][/FONT][/COLOR][COLOR=#FFFFFF][FONT="]Save[/FONT]
yes, the stealing is odd...but I'm not seeing smoking gun or red flag in the face
other people use repellent
well off people shop lift:
http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-16469928
hindsight is 20-20 here
is it suspicious?? sure...red flag--no
and from the initial post on this--I doubt the investigators for the murders even saw his record...did they?
For most of the same reasons why not everyone DNA would be on file