I disagree.Normally a suspect is developed, arrested and charged by matching a suspect to the evidence. In this case it appears the evidence was developed and created based upon matching it to the suspect.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I disagree.Normally a suspect is developed, arrested and charged by matching a suspect to the evidence. In this case it appears the evidence was developed and created based upon matching it to the suspect.
You are ignoring the context here. They added a Faro scan and the witness they put up was criticized heavily by the defense, who argued that he was not qualified.
So because they wanted to keep the Faro scan in the evidence submission , they chose a new witness to testify about it. There is noting unethical or illegal about doing so.
Are you going to say the same thing if the defense changes any of their witnesses?
Well, I recorded most of that day. But with all the ridiculous freeze-ups, it's not that great. L&C better upload both today and day 26.
I did record all of Merritt's interview with no freeze-ups.
What about the jail tapes? The prosecution is resting without playing those?
Yeah this is the part that it becomes clear that the defense is all mouth and no trousers as we say over this side of the Atlantic.Surprised me too. Figured he may be busy with his attys this week?
Just catching up, I read on Cathy's twitter that it was a youtube problem today, not an "L&C" problem. Take it for what it's worth ... lol
I was wondering about the jail tapes too. We never did hear the end of that hearing, they came back after lunch. I wonder if the judge ruled that it could be used, but only if Jarvis testified? Which would mean in rebuttal? I do recall that the judge said that if the State used them, that he would also allow the defense to put in all of her prior statements and interviews with LE.
So today it was a youtube problem? Does that mean they will have the problem resolved by next Tuesday? So DONE with these people. They are THE worst. Wanna be live crimestation, IMO.Just catching up, I read on Cathy's twitter that it was a youtube problem today, not an "L&C" problem. Take it for what it's worth ... lol
I was wondering about the jail tapes too. We never did hear the end of that hearing, they came back after lunch. I wonder if the judge ruled that it could be used, but only if Jarvis testified? Which would mean in rebuttal? I do recall that the judge said that if the State used them, that he would also allow the defense to put in all of her prior statements and interviews with LE.
Normally a suspect is developed, arrested and charged by matching a suspect to the evidence. In this case it appears the evidence was developed and created based upon matching it to the suspect.
This judge just gave a very convincing list of vital evidence against Chase. This must be very depressing for the defense to hear right now.
Yep. His DT are working hard for their boy.Just for the record, I believe in due process, too. I think the evidence against the two timed felon is overwhelming. I also believe he entitled to a vigorous defense. He is getting it. I am applying logic and reason to what the defense has offered, and I am just not buying what they are selling. We will see how they try to explain the backdating and the DNA in the Trooper, but so far, their explanation falls flat.
Again, to be clear, I believe in due process.
Like I said... they should be taking notes, or ask the judge to do it for them lol JMOI feel as though I am listening to closing arguments by the prosecution. Clear and concise! Too bad the jury isn't hearing this.
Not only that, but also once they began to pick out a suspect, they became fixated on him, closing all doors to further investigations into other acquaintances of JM. It seems they have never bothered to make thorough investigations into the finances and phone records of any other people that gained from the deaths as they have done with Chase.
I would love to but the feed was so awful I have given up. It was the worse it ever has been for me today. Constant buffering and reloading didn’t help.
What evidence do you have that the police did not make a thorough investigation, that they "fixated" on CM? Is it because he is the one on trial?
Well to be fair, he was forging checks out of the dead guy’s bank account and his cell phone did ping near where all the bodies were found. If you ignore those minor little details, then you’re right, they’re picking on poor Chasey boy.Not only that, but also once they began to pick out a suspect, they became fixated on him, closing all doors to further investigations into other acquaintances of JM. It seems they have never bothered to make thorough investigations into the finances and phone records of any other people that gained from the deaths as they have done with Chase.
The judge determined the first Faro witness was not qualified that's not the defense's problem. IMO that should have been the end of it no witness, no Faro testimony. Concerning the defense doing the same as the prosecution did IMO that would also be a violation of the discovery rules.
I wonder if this will change the minds of the L&C talking heads who have a different opinion?
Normally a suspect is developed, arrested and charged by matching a suspect to the evidence. In this case it appears the evidence was developed and created based upon matching it to the suspect.
You are the one who made the accusation, not me. I am all ears as to how you came to this conclusion.Do you have evidence that the did make as thorough investigation into the finances and phone records of other acquaintances of JM who gained from the deaths as they did with Chase? (Those are my original words, please don't omit)