Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The whole thing is just so messed up IMO.I’d think that Imes might be quite angry—and rightly so—if someone that he respected was caught faking illness in such an outrageous way.
Gosh, I hope he didn't! It's sad enough that Imes was spending the night watching McGee instead of having a good time himself without snapping pictures as proof. I mean, really and then to bring it up in a court room fill of people instead of having a chat to the judge in private. That just says more about Imes than it does about McGee in my opinion. Seriously, Imes must be really desperate to stoop so low. MOO
Seriously, who cares what he was doing on Saturday? He showed up for the trial yesterday, he said after 30 minutes he realized that he was not ready to be there. I think that he thought he was good to go but at some point figured he just couldn't be as sharp as he should be... he has a responsibility to his client, if he is not all in, that is not fair to his client, by recognizing that, he very well could have just eliminated an appeal issue if he is convicted. Isn't that a good thing???? Especially if you are in the "Merritt is guilty" camp... don't you want to know that he was fully represented so this cannot be an appeal issue later?
I’d think that Imes might be quite angry—and rightly so—if someone that he respected was caught faking illness in such an outrageous way.
Who cares what he was doing Saturday? I DO. lmao
He is threatening a mistrial in this case, because he is not feeling strong enough, healthy enough to attend to the trial. But he has enough energy to go out drinking and dancing at night? Shouldn't he be conserving his strength and trying to get better?
It makes me doubt his original physical complaint. He is not on chemo if he is out drinking at night. And he doesn't have a bad heart if he is out drinking and dancing. So what is preventing him from helping with closing arguments and interviewing witnesses? I'd like to know.
Me neither. Just envisioning those babies curled up with crushed skulls is too much to ponder.
BBM, It wasn't just that he showed up for trial yesterday. If he has been faking illness to hang up a DP murder trial, that is disgusting and just not on, IMO. He should be kicked off the case.Seriously, who cares what he was doing on Saturday? He showed up for the trial yesterday, he said after 30 minutes he realized that he was not ready to be there. I think that he thought he was good to go but at some point figured he just couldn't be as sharp as he should be... he has a responsibility to his client, if he is not all in, that is not fair to his client, by recognizing that, he very well could have just eliminated an appeal issue if he is convicted. Isn't that a good thing???? Especially if you are in the "Merritt is guilty" camp... don't you want to know that he was fully represented so this cannot be an appeal issue later?
Maybe he is a DV victim in hiding. I have been in previous years! What does this prove?The judge is going to allow testimony that will imply that Dan is in hiding.
Gosh, I hope he didn't! It's sad enough that Imes was spending the night watching McGee instead of having a good time himself without snapping pictures as proof. I mean, really and then to bring it up in a court room fill of people instead of having a chat to the judge in private. That just says more about Imes than it does about McGee in my opinion. Seriously, Imes must be really desperate to stoop so low. MOO
BBM, It wasn't just that he showed up for trial yesterday. If he has been faking illness to hang up a DP murder trial, that is disgusting and just not on, IMO. He should be kicked off the case.
Honestly, I couldn't care less what any of them do on the weekend so long as it doesn't delay the proceedings.Seriously, who cares what he was doing on Saturday? He showed up for the trial yesterday, he said after 30 minutes he realized that he was not ready to be there. I think that he thought he was good to go but at some point figured he just couldn't be as sharp as he should be... he has a responsibility to his client, if he is not all in, that is not fair to his client, by recognizing that, he very well could have just eliminated an appeal issue if he is convicted. Isn't that a good thing???? Especially if you are in the "Merritt is guilty" camp... don't you want to know that he was fully represented so this cannot be an appeal issue later?
I'm not so sure if it would? And even if it did it would be better than this nonsense with this current DT, IMO.And that would create a mistrial. IMO
Maybe the judge will now start doubting what he thought he knew.It doesn't matter what WE know, it only matters what the Judge knows. JMO
Well of course, we are not the jury. Lol Nothing on here matters as it's just a forum for us to voice our opinions and throw our thoughts out.It doesn't matter what WE know, it only matters what the Judge knows. JMO
And give a little more thought when making rulings, decisions, etc.Maybe the judge will now start doubting what he thought he knew.
He was there yesterday, do we know if he told the Judge that he was fine on the weekend but just couldn't do it or if something has happened since? Do we know if the Judge was also at this social function and possibly dancing with McGee? Maybe he bought McGee a drink?
And the PT caught wind of the rumour so decided to bring it up in a courtroom fill of people, while the trial is in progress, instead of speaking to the judge in private. How unprofessional. Not very good at all! MOO
Yeah right. I wonder if he can get disbarred for his antics?He was not really 'there' yesterday. He was weak, sat separately , and did not take part in the proceedings, as far as I could see. He certainly didn't look like he could jump up and dance.JMO