An "easy-target scapegoat"?? Where's the look of confusion and disbelief that should be on the face of a man who is in shock at what is happening to him?Looks like an easy-target scapegoat.
I don't have a place to direct you for a quick summary or breakdown of things. But yes, EIP was very legit, purchase at Ross was never brought up at trial (or Summer's call to sister), no confirmation if either Joseph or Chase were at the restaurant. Nothing about any prescription whatsoever.I have followed this case for years but haven't been able to keep up recently with the trial. Does anyone know if there is a summary of facts of the case? For instance, in the past, there was a question about whether EIP was legitimate. Was that ever ascertained? There were also many other mysteries surrounding this case. Like the purchases at Ross, the children's medicine prescription and whether the lunch at Chick Filet ever took place. Have those issues been resolved. Does it seem like beyond a reasonable doubt that Chase is guilty? Thanks.
I have followed this case for years but haven't been able to keep up recently with the trial. Does anyone know if there is a summary of facts of the case? For instance, in the past, there was a question about whether EIP was legitimate. Was that ever ascertained? There were also many other mysteries surrounding this case. Like the purchases at Ross, the children's medicine prescription and whether the lunch at Chick Filet ever took place. Have those issues been resolved. Does it seem like beyond a reasonable doubt that Chase is guilty? Thanks.
RSBMwhether the lunch at Chick Filet ever took place
Professions that I used to look up to, now have my utter contempt.
whether the lunch at Chick Filet ever took place.
RSBM
If only the defence would produce the witness who claimed there was a lunch at Chick-fil-A ....
Unfortunately it's become a theme that the defence claims many things happened without producing any testimony from the person(s) who have personal knowledge of events.
Sad.
To be honest i have not closely followed this trial: I just haven't had the patience for it. if it was on court TV i probably would be watching it. From what I am reading here, the judge is allowing all kinds of defense BS to be presented in this trial: reminds me of Casey Anthony. I don't understand how a judge can allow all kinds of unproven (without evidence) theories to be thrown out there; the judge has to know that some juries might believe any or all of it---even though there is no evidence to back these allegations up. For me, Casey Anthony was the most painful trial i have ever watched; i watched it all of it and it made me physically ill. The worst part of it was all those horrible lies told by Baez actually worked and as we know the jury acquitted her. We know that many criminal defense attorneys will attempt to get away with all kinds of garbage: it is up to the judge to rein in the defense attorney, but sounds like in this case, that is not happening. Sigh.
Is this trial almost over??
I am reluctant to say this because of the delays..... but yes lol They are supposed to be back on Tuesday the 21st, that will be Dr. Rudin testifying for the defense, they said it should only be 1 day (I could see it going into the next day). Last I heard, the prosecution only had a few rebuttal witnesses (can't recall if that was said in court or if it was from Cathy Russon on L&C, or both). I do think that the lawyers and judge have been or did work on the exhibits and jury instructions this week, who knows how much or if they will get all of that done before next week. My guess would be that they should do closings either late next week or maybe the 28th? I am not sure if the jurors can deliberate on Friday's there? They can't have court days on Fridays lol And not sure about weekends either...
An "easy-target scapegoat"?? Where's the look of confusion and disbelief that should be on the face of a man who is in shock at what is happening to him?
That is the posture of a man who knows that the jig is up, the game is over, and he has been caught dead to rights.
I am reluctant to say this because of the delays..... but yes lol They are supposed to be back on Tuesday the 21st, that will be Dr. Rudin testifying for the defense, they said it should only be 1 day (I could see it going into the next day). Last I heard, the prosecution only had a few rebuttal witnesses (can't recall if that was said in court or if it was from Cathy Russon on L&C, or both). I do think that the lawyers and judge have been or did work on the exhibits and jury instructions this week, who knows how much or if they will get all of that done before next week. My guess would be that they should do closings either late next week or maybe the 28th? I am not sure if the jurors can deliberate on Friday's there? They can't have court days on Fridays lol And not sure about weekends either...
RSBMObviously the State will rip the defense in its closing
Those are fog lights or driving lights under the bumper, not running lights. The lights under the bumper don't come on by default with the headlights like a running light would. You can turn the fog (or driving) lights on once and they will be on the next time the headlights are activated. But they are not running lights.Fog lights are usually yellow/amber and to the side or under the headlights.
Just went out checked, DH's truck has round running lights below the grill like the Dodge.