ProductiveOne
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2023
- Messages
- 166
- Reaction score
- 466
I can certainly see why you have reservation, and agree. Here are my thoughts:Thank you for looking into this and submitting. I have a few reservations. The Namus file for the UID mentioned blue eyes (honestly in her pictures they look brown) Donna has brown eyes. The National Missing and Unidentified Persons System (NamUs)
The other thing is the timeline. Donna went missing in 1989. I'm just wondering if and how the following could fit in Donna's story:
From timeline up thread.
April 16, 1984 - (*34 years old) Resides in Stockton, CA - zip code 95205
Recently divorced (17 Oct 1983) Donald G. Austin (56 years old at the time) shares same dates of occupancy, and zip code April 16, 1984 to November 15, 2007
1. Yes, Donna is listed as having brown eyes, however, the notes say that Donna's "Eyes were either brown or blue."
2. According to Donna's profile "She was reported missing on 06/18/1990, seven months after she was last seen. The reason for this is unknown and there are few details about her case."
Suspicions were raised with regard to the peculiar reporting of her missing. It may be that she was gone before the reported date, or that Donna kept in contact with family while living in California up until the reported missing date.