What should matter to him is whether or not the family appreciates his services. If he's working for them pro bono, then I assume his main priority is to find the boys. Or was, I guess.
Well nothing can prevent him for searching on his own like any other Citizen. Given his expressed concern for the welfare of these children, I'm sure he will. If he wasn't in alignment with LE, then searching as a Citizen is probably all for the best. Who knows, he may be the one who finds them.
I believe he declared that he was volunteering his services.
I'm sure we are all interested to see the photos of those chalk marks/drawings the boys made. Of course, LE has experts who will be able to determine if they were indeed the artwork of children.
Reward money I think has reached $100,000 if I am not mistaken.
MOO
I wonder if they still wore pull-ups at night. Many 3 yr old boys still need them for sleep time....There SHOULD have been evidence like that left behind.
My 5 yr old granddaughter plays w/chalk on her patio almost every day. But she wouldn't do so if she only had one or two chalk colors. I can't imagine trying to keep 2 'rambunctious' boys busy for very long with one or two pieces of chalk on the patio.
Yes, I should have said, I wonder who "retained" him. I assumed it was the extended family who sought his services, since they mentioned having a PI in their statement. I guess you get what you pay for.
Why would 2 adults need 30 minutes to search for 2 young boys inside the house? I think they could figure out they were not inside in 10 minutes max--unless they thought the boys were purposely hiding. But even then, I could find my grandbaby within minutes when she tried to play hide seek at that age.
And even if they did have toothbrushes and hats used by O and O at the new house, how would LE know if they had just been brought over in the move, without the boys being present?
Welcome to WS. Nice first post. I kinda feel bad for the guy. The thing is if he would have acted professional he would have received professional feedback. He blew that chance when he went to the media for his 15 minutes instead of reporting tip to LE. It’s on him. He bears the responsibility.
Wouldn’t that be a story? Hmmm, I hope he does. His confidence is so low right now. C’mon PI, keep your chin up. You made a bad decision. Learn and grow.
EXACTLY. If that tip about the 2 men, walking with the boys, was valid, then putting it into the public was a mistake. It would give the men a head's up, putting the boys into even more danger.
Sounds like the ultimate control freak wouldn't allow them to? MOO
Yes, can someone explain how this dog business came into the picture. Did I read something about a dog door in one of the photos up thread? Does anyone remember that?
There was a beware of dog sign at both the cal city house and an identical one at the Bakersfield house associated with parents and grandparents. Social media profiles are not to be discussed limiting discussion.
That was me, I said it looked like a doggie door next to the slider that was boarded up. It was one of the pictures Tricia posted. Don't know how to bring it over. Amanda probably could.
