Blondiexoxo
Studying Forensic Psychology BSc hons
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2018
- Messages
- 1,113
- Reaction score
- 14,359
If Durst has sepsis he wouldn’t be in court he’d be in intensive care. If this is true it’s quite alarming. As much as I want him to be held accountable after all this time, I also want him still alive when the verdict is read. Additionally, if the defense are saying he has a UTI, that can cause mental disturbances, confusion, hallucination especially in a man of Durst’s age. His defense team will milk this diagnosis for all its worth, but as he’s in that courtroom and has the conscious of mind to be keeping track of the trial I doubt a doctor would have even cleared him to be there if they were concerned about sepsis. I was 25 years old when I contracted it and I spent 2 weeks in hospital and have only very hazy memory of that entire time, it was the worst experience of my life. Someone of Durst’s age with that diagnosis should be on IV antibiotics, IV fluids, and his blood pressure being monitored every couple of hours to assess his condition. Maybe he was slightly septic at one point, because if he has sepsis right now he should be in hospital receiving treatment and under observation, it’s not the flu or a UTI it is blood poisoning and will kill a young healthy person within hours.