Sounds like the property and the home were searched at the time. Blood was found in the van?? Husband hasnt' done a lie detector test? Could she have left in the early morning to go and meet a secret.. friend(?), telling her husband she was going to the casino? Husband says it was not uncommon for her to go to the casino and not come home for a couple of days? Makes me wonder if she could have met someone at the casino at some point, like a romantic interest perhaps, which nobody knew about. If LE asked for husband's DNA, does that indicate the blood in the van may not have belonged to the victim, and belonged instead to the apparent perp? Can't they get the victim's DNA from sources other than her body, ie her hairbrush perhaps?
http://www.mykawartha.com/news-story/4509912-one-year-later-where-is-lorraine-roach-/
OPP say Mrs. Roach’s case is still considered a missing person’s case and not a homicide. Mr. Roach says he has been interviewed a handful of times since his wife vanished. He says OPP have search their home and property as well as property the family owns up north.
“They did their searches with dogs and everything else,” he says.
“I will do ever it takes and I will do whatever they want.”
About a month and a half ago, Mr. Roach says police asked and he gave them a DNA sample because they found blood in the van. Police have also asked him to do a lie detector test but he has yet to do one.
“George says he is an open book with police yet he refused a lie detector test,” says Mr. *advertiser censored*, despite Mr. Roach saying he didn’t refuse the test.
“I believe there’s questions he still needs to answer,” adds Mr. *advertiser censored*.
http://www.mykawartha.com/news-story/4509912-one-year-later-where-is-lorraine-roach-/