A few days ago, I wrote a long post about the Split Lake and York Landing events, and the junk appearing in the Daily Mail, as a follow up to repeated posts stating the the Split Lake people are not police officers, let alone RCMP, and that the Bear Clan is just a neighbourhood watch group, with no training and no experience in the north, whose “sighting” should not be taken at face value, in part because it made no sense on its face.
I also talked about the dynamics, something this journalist is also talking about when he says “There are several explanations for the false alarm in York Landing and I'm not going to spell them out.” In my long post, I come closer to spelling them out, but like him I also left some things unsaid. Read my post slowly, and what happened may become crystal clear.
In my view, there are far too many people in this world who are in a hurry to believe anybody but the professionals who are actually carrying out an investigation, and are all the happier if they can implicitly criticize those professionals in the process.
Go back a few days and you’ll find posts from people who were at pains to point out that the Bear Clan was not invited into these communities by the RCMP. In other words, the Bear Clan, not the RCMP, was “solving” the crime. The Australian journalist suggests, astutely in my view, that they not only didn’t solve the crime, but may have occasioned a significant waste of time and resources.
Also, there were posts saying that the RCMP were both incompetent and unprofessional because they didn’t have working radios, and as a consequence were firing their guns to communicate. As this Australian journalist says, that is rubbish.
Everything this journalist is saying makes complete sense to me, as someone who, while I may now live in New York, knows Manitoba, and its politics, like the back of my hand.
Cheers