Okay, here's a report of what Cordero and Ramsey did..via..this article, and Cordero agreeing that Ramsey helped.
"Aurora Marti said she was the first person to see Amanda Berry screaming in Castro's doorway.
As Marti and her friend, Ana, crossed the street towards Berry, they called out to Ramsey for help, but with the women's broken English, communicating was hard, Marti told ABC News. So the women yelled for help from their friend, Angel Cordero, a fellow Spanish speaker.
Ramsey was there and did help free Berry, Marti said, but it was Cordero who kicked down Castro's door, setting Berry free.
When Berry screamed, "I'm Amanda Berry!" according to Marti, she replied, "No, Amanda Berry died years ago."
Cordero and Ana both agreed with Marti's version of events.
Neither Marti nor Cordero deny that Ramsey was there and that he helped, Marti said, but the heavy lifting to set the women free, according to Marti, was done by Cordero. "
http://www.wrkr.com/common/more.php...ticle=5E74A55FB90711E286DEFEFDADE6840A&mode=2
and
http://abcnews.go.com/US/amanda-ber...rescue-details/story?id=19143927#.UZFASLXOlmo
If Cordero is saying somewhere that Ramsey only placed a 911 call and Aurora is saying that's not what happened, should we scrutinize him as a liar trying to deceive the cops and the media? He, Angel, also talked about hearing Amanda scream and running over to help. This person Aurora, says she heard the screams first and called Cordero over. These are two slightly different versions of the same story, with basically the same effect. Does leaving Aurora out of the equation and not giving her credit of being the person to actually try to get help for Amanda FIRST make Cordero a liar and a deceitful person? If Cordero gives the impression in his interviews that he was alone, when this Aurora person says he was not, does that make him a deceitful liar? Should we now dissect his interviews and hold him accountable for every inconsistency?
Also, there's plenty of evidence that Amanda could not get out of the house. Even in all their inconsistencies, the one part of the story that has stayed consistent between all of them is that she could not get out the door. There's also a video of the police having to break the door down. That's probably one of the easiest things to prove and because the officers will have to testify (if it goes to trial) to entering the house, searching the house and finding the women, there's no reason not to let them testify as to the door being locked.