miimaa
Well-Known Member
I have said all along that unless they can prove beyond a doubt that the car was under surveillance 24/7 I will not believe there was a dead body in it prior to it being abandoned by Casey at Amscot.
Wouldn't it have been much easier for Casey to just push the car into a lake somewhere if it contained damaging evidence?
I don't want to rub anyone the wrong way or create animosity towards myself for having a different opinion that the majority of posters here, but I still stand by my belief that there is a serious lack of evidence in regards to Caylee being dead.
And that really bothers me because the poor child will almost have to lay down and play dead if she wants to be found at this rate.
snipped...
Hmmmm..... if I had to hide a dead body what would I do? Hide it in a random car at a tow lot? Then retrieve it and put it someplace else? No. I would expect the tow lot to have security cameras for one. Unless I was the tow lot owner... but then I wouldn't bother contacting the real owner of the car. The car would have been crushed and never seen again.
The evidence is that there was a decomposing body in that car. The possibility that it was someone other than Caylee is remote. In my opinion Casey is not smart enough or ambitious enough to push the car into a lake... I doubt she thought anyone would NOT believe her story.