Did some more watching of closing arguments by both DT and PT today. I know there are posters here who think the state hasn't laid out a convincing case, but how to get past all the lies and bizarre assumptions on the part of the DT? There are so many. And: Chase's story has changed so many, many times, and it all fits with where the case was going at the time. At first he claimed that the custom account was created to hide money from Summer, then later when it becomes necessary to blame DK, the account is created to hide it from him.
Then, there's the ever changing story and timing of his first visit to the McStay home after the 4th. Then, the changing of the dog-feeding story. It goes on and on and on. You can move through his story changes and track the case perfectly.
I find it very difficult to believe that anyone believes Chase isn't guilty, whether or not the state has laid out a case BARD. Just hope he has a date, earlier rather than later, with Old Sparky.
And, am so very inclined to believe that this isn't his first venture into murder.