SleuthBee
Well known member
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2020
- Messages
- 1,357
- Reaction score
- 17,211
Megnut, you summarized perfectly!I can summarize:
Reporter: "So you were the last person to see Gannon?"
TS: " Correct!"
The End.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Megnut, you summarized perfectly!I can summarize:
Reporter: "So you were the last person to see Gannon?"
TS: " Correct!"
The End.
I need to catch up on this case. Other than being the last person to see him, can anyone sum of the key facts that point to her guilt?
... and we don't that either, right?
But we do know that the family had 2 dogs and now AS wants Sadie returned. Its safe to conclude the Sadie was taken or disappeared.
"I also believe the puppy (Sadie) meant a lot to Gannon. So when the caravan left, why take one of the dogs and not both?" ~SleuthBee
ETA: clarification
Sure. It's certainly safe to assume AS didn't have 3-4 month old Sadie at the beginning of March when he filed for divorce and he wants her back. We don't know why he does. Maybe GS was fond of her for the short time the family had her before Jan 27. Or maybe the little sister was. Or both. Or maybe AS simply considers the dog his property and is pissed off. Who could blame him? We just don't know.
It's not safe to assume anything about the other dog IMO. Maybe he/she was left behind. Or maybe he/she wasn't left behind but AS doesn't want that dog back or doesn't feel he has a claim on that dog. As I said, maybe the other dog belonged to HH or TS before TS and AS married in 2015. (I don't think we know the age of the other dog.)
It's not safe to assume Sadie disappeared when GS did IMO. Some on WS have suggested she did and maybe TS killed her too on that Monday. But if the dog disappeared with GS, it seems it would have been in the news at some point, especially when the runaway story was still making the rounds.
JMO
If the dog had disappeared with Gannon, LE and family would have mentioned it very early on because it would've been a critical part of his description... even more important than the clothes he was last seen wearing. Finding the dog would've been critically important to finding GS.
I used to teach Elie Wiesel's memoir, Night, and sometimes would arrange for elderly Holocaust survivors to speak to our eighth-graders. They endured such unspeakable atrocities, and lost their entire families to truly depraved acts of murder.
So many things that we've learned from them have made a deep impression on my students and me. I have Holocaust survivors in my family, (as well as some who were killed in my grandmother's generation), and still study about the Holocaust now. But one particular sentence from an ancient Holocaust survivor caught my attention. She said, "there's nothing so wonderful as a boring day."
Think about that. How wonderful would a boring day, nothing special happening, have been for Gannon's parents? For Chloe's family on the ship? For the families of every missing or murdered child?
I am reminded of that Holocaust survivor now, because I keep complaining to my family and friends about how bored I am trapped in my apartment during coronavirus. It flashed into my mind, though---how wonderful it is to have a boring day! That means nothing awful has happened! I'd certainly rather be safe and bored at home than to be in a hospital, sick with the virus and struggling to breathe.
So let's thank God that we here are not afflicted with something that has us in the ICU, and let's thank God that we are not identifying our children, and stay home and stay safe until this crisis is over, whenever that may be.
Good health and courage to all my fellow Websleuthers, to the mods, and pray for the health care workers and first responders.
Leigh Egan posted her ONLY interview with LS in two parts on CrimeOnLineFebruary 27 and 29.........strongly implying that the interview was "fresh". LS was arrested early on March 2. Hospitals generally keep patients for a minimum of 24 hours. This is a really tight time frame to be pursuing a followup interview to that first one. Do you really think HH needed to cite additional excuses?
Just the one bombshell about her Mom being preggers in the hospital would be sufficient, IMO.
Gannon Stauch stepmom reveals where she went the day Colorado boy disappeared [EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW]
Gannon Stauch: Stepmom explains rental car as search for missing Colorado boy continues [EXCLUSIVE PART 2]
BBM:I need to catch up on this case. Other than being the last person to see him, can anyone sum of the key facts that point to her guilt?
Hi @Dave F.
Actually, Leigh disclosed that she had one "formal" interview with LS, then "many, many casual conversations". ETA: there is also a part three to the exclusive interview with Leigh Eaton.
Gannon Stauch: Stepmom says bloody board was not her fault. She’s now facing child abuse, murder charges [EXCLUSIVE PART 3]
Leigh has joined Tricia several times on the WS YouTube channel, in addition to Crime Stories with Nancy Grace. You can glean quite a bit of information listening to these!
‘Crime Stories’: Remains of 11-year-old Gannon Stauch found MILES away from his Colorado home
I am just not understanding your point at all. And I don't recall anyone here on WS stating that TS killed Sadie or stated that Sadie disappeared with Gannon as fact. However, it is possible that some may have mentioned it out of concern or fear. And I really don't see anyone assuming anything about the other dog or stating it as fact. MOO is they are just theorizing just as you and others are.Sure. It's certainly safe to assume AS didn't have 3-4 month old Sadie at the beginning of March when he filed for divorce and he wants her back. We don't know why he does. Maybe GS was fond of her for the short time the family had her before Jan 27. Or maybe the little sister was. Or both. Or maybe AS simply considers the dog his property and is pissed off. Who could blame him? We just don't know.
It's not safe to assume anything about the other dog IMO. Maybe he/she was left behind. Or maybe he/she wasn't left behind but AS doesn't want that dog back or doesn't feel he has a claim on that dog. As I said, maybe the other dog belonged to HH or TS before TS and AS married in 2015. (I don't think we know the age of the other dog.)
It's not safe to assume Sadie disappeared when GS did IMO. Some on WS have suggested she did and maybe TS killed her too on that Monday. But if the dog disappeared with GS, it seems it would have been in the news at some point, especially when the runaway story was still making the rounds.
JMO
BBM:
The real evidentiary foundation of the case will be contained in the arrest affidavit, and that hasn't been made public yet.
Having said that, here are a few of the damning things that we do know point to her:
1) TS told LE that she last saw GS when he left the house between 3:15 - 4:00 that Monday to walk to "a friend's house."
2) Subsequent to TS's story about GS leaving the house on Monday afternoon b/t 3:15 - 4:00 to go to "a friend's house," a neighbor (RD) provided a video to MSM showing TS leaving the house with GS in a truck at 10:13 am on Monday morning and TS returning to the house at 2:19 on Monday afternoon alone. No GS with her. "She lied."
3) Her Cousin Itt interview and subsequent phone interview in which she bakes in all kinds excuses for GS's blood being found in the home, garage, and/or vehicles are utterly damning.
4) The purported "can my parents find me if my phone is off" search on his phone.
5) The fact that she deliberately mischaracterized him as a "runaway" to LE.
6) The fact that she rented a vehicle at the airport the next morning.
7) Her prior arrest record for violent offenses, coupled with the fact that she was the last person to see him.
I need to catch up on this case. Other than being the last person to see him, can anyone sum of the key facts that point to her guilt?
Competitive may be a character trait we overlookedIf a gun is missing from the home, she’s exceeded the combined stupidity of Frazee and Watts
8 Even after her arrest and during transport back to Co via Kansas, she slipped out of her handcuffs and beat the heck out of the deputy. Or atleast she/he required a trip to the hospital for medical attention. While this isn’t hard evidence against her, I do believe it shows her current state of mind jmo
If the dog had disappeared with Gannon, LE and family would have mentioned it very early on because it would've been a critical part of his description... even more important than the clothes he was last seen wearing. Finding the dog would've been critically important to finding GS.
CO - Gannon Stauch, 11, Colorado Spring, El Paso County, 27 Jan 2020 *MEDIA MAPS TIMELINE*I need to catch up on this case. Other than being the last person to see him, can anyone sum of the key facts that point to her guilt?
Regarding the question of why the neighbor, whose security video showed TS leaving with but not returning with Gannon, isn't on the witness list: it seems to me that since the video would have been captured in the network/cloud of the security system provider, it would be that provider who would be called to verify its validity, not the neighbor him or herself. A customer could potentially "fiddle" with a downloaded video; the provider who captured the original, however, would be the one to verify its authenticity as the original, unedited version.