Hopefullyhelpful
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2018
- Messages
- 332
- Reaction score
- 3,266
I had suspected from the get-go he orchestrated the text to explain why he had not reported her missing. Now I am wondering if willingly submitted his DNA was a sign of someone else being involved... So I we're both still in the dark as to whether it was his choice.... Is there a attorney in the house tonight?
MOO - The whole issue of him willingly submitting his DNA is pretty useless in the big picture if you really think about it. They were an engaged couple. His DNA should be all over her home. He saw and had contact with her the day she went missing, his DNA (assuming the day she went missing was a tragic day for her) should be on be on her person and could be explained as contact prior to demise. In other words, he had nothing to lose by volunteering his DNA and only had a "gain" in the cooperation category. With regards to his speaking only through a lawyer, much as it's frustrating, it's smart. It's the right thing to do. He, as her partner is the automatic suspect, and retaining counsel to represent his interest in the matter and protect him is the right thing to do for himself. It may appear cold and calculating, and it may actually be cold and calculating, but rest assured, if my son found himself in a similar situation, I'd advise him to do exactly the same. (Mind you - if he really was guilty, I'd drag him by the ear to the police myself.....but that's just me....) MOO