Seattle1
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2013
- Messages
- 41,560
- Reaction score
- 432,071
Neither grandparent has parental rights. There is now an appointed GAL and the State has legal custody and CB has physical custody. I'm not going to second-guess their decision.
BBM. What on earth are you talking about? CB couldn't abduct the child and abscond with her because SF has parental rights and CB had no custodial rights whatsoever. She was granted temporary custody because the State wanted her to have temporary custody because it is in the best interest of the child. This isn't all that complicated. JMO
I agree that neither grandparent has "parental rights" -- that was the point of my prior post. It's also clearly not what you said in the post I replied to.
Last edited: