Hmmm... I think it is the judge in the criminal case who might be very displeased.
In the new long motion from the public defender, he is truthful in pointing up how it has been the prosecution requesting to keep even the arrest warrant from the PD and the defendant for so long - then DA May practically asked the media to make FOIA requests at the presser after KK's hearing. The judge has declined to release any documents until after PF's 2/19 hearing when the judge will deal with those motions and may or may not release them.
And now this release from the B's civil attorney smacks of an end run around the orderly conduct of his court. IMO, it is a statement of what CB's testimony will be in the upcoming criminal trial. IDK if the DA's office approved this release or not, they would not admit it if they did, but it looks like lawyer games. Judges do not like to be circumvented and the judge might be really angry, the judge who will determine on Tuesday whether or not to bind PF over on any of the 5 charges and determine whether he gets bail.
I realize this amended document is from the civil case, but they are perceived as on "the same side" as the prosecutor's office.
Where are our VA's? Can they enlighten us to this strategy? What was the point of this timing? Will the judge be angry?