nwmouse
Verified cheese addict.
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2013
- Messages
- 1,654
- Reaction score
- 16,940
Reporters were in the courtroom listening to the DA's argument and the Judge's response.
JMO
Yes they were listening and there are no mentions of SF being advised by her attorney to plead the 5th simply because she was afraid of implicating herself about a law you stated in your quote below. Which is why some of us were puzzled and asked for clarification and an actual link. Thank you for responding that you were just speculating with a JMO, as I read your post as if you were stating a fact.
BBM. It's really quite simple. The DA wanted to ask SF about an alleged fire on her property. Open burning of waste (such as plastic) has been illegal in Colorado for years. SF is the owner of the property which is why her attorney told the judge she would invoke the 5th.
JMO
IMHO SF invoking the 5th due to her attorney's advice had little to do with her being worried about the open burning of waste and plastic being illegal in Colorado, and more to do with her having information about evidence in a homicide being destroyed on her property, in which her son PF is the main suspect.
Because imho, knowledge of someone burning a dead body on one's property is far more serious than pleading the 5th in case one gets into trouble for the open burning of waste or plastic on a property.
moo.
Last edited: