Odd the clothing they found discarded in the store doesn’t include a plaid shirt, which per the affidavit an officer in the store described as being worn by the man shooting. He also said he believed the shooter was blond, though he “wasn’t sure”. It must be hard to remember details when under fire, but seems like a trained LE officer (presumably SWAT) would be better at it than most.
As I understand it, the sole purpose of an arrest affidavit is to show cause for arrest. It’s not a summary of all evidence to date.
This is an affidavit supporting the arrest of AA and only AA. I’m puzzled why the plaid shirt/blond hair description was included at all. To our knowledge it doesn’t describe AA and surely there are all sorts of inaccurate witness descriptions that don’t make it into an affidavit. So why include this one?
I have no doubt that AA was responsible for the shootings. Was the officer mistaken about who was shooting or did he remember their appearance incorrectly? Was an armed civilian not associated with AA scared, confused and shooting thinking they were protecting themselves? Or is it possible that AA had an accomplice after all?
ETA link to affidavit:
https://lede-admin.coloradosun.com/...avit-for-Arrest-Warrant-Alissa_Redacted-1.pdf