Hello everyone,
I have been interested in Roger's disappearance for decades. I have posted here several times. A few things that Mr. Pash mentioned in his posts have stuck in my mind, and I have some questions for him.
Mr. Pash explained the type of psychology/Freudian assignment he gave the class: a series of "single-word response for the 2 words/phrases that were part of the in-class free association exercise." He didn't remember all of the words/phrases he came up with, "except for 2 of them- the 2 that the detective asked me what they were and which he focused on. And then he showed me what Roger had written, and I was shocked. It was the same answer for both."
What were the two words/phrases that elicited the same single-word response from Roger? Mr. Pash gave examples of the type of words/phrases he used: red/green, parents/family, church/religion. Okay, so what single word would be so shocking and appropriate for two words/phrases? Blood? Murder? Homosexual?
Mr. Pash wrote that others were responsible for the situation Roger found himself in; he outlined that one of Roger's options to deal with his situation was "[t]o confront those responsible for the situation." So, I think we can extrapolate that more than one person would likely judge Roger harshly for his situation, perhaps his entire community, in 1981.
Mr. Pash also said he would only reveal Roger's two responses if he is "required to as a legal matter." But, in another post Mr. Pash wrote "for the next 15 years or so, I actually used Roger’s circumstances when discussing free association with my classes as an example of how it could help a therapist go in a certain direction of inquiry. But when I found out that he hadn’t been found (a rumor is after all, just a rumor), I stopped using it as an example. But that means about 1500-1800 former students know Roger’s story." So, he has revealed the mystery phrases and other details of Roger's disappearance without any legal consequences.
What were "Roger's circumstances" and "Roger's story", Mr. Pash? After so many years, and with so many people aware of the details, why not everything (again) now to us? It's your choice, of course, but would you give it some thought?
Thank you,
lgr
I have been interested in Roger's disappearance for decades. I have posted here several times. A few things that Mr. Pash mentioned in his posts have stuck in my mind, and I have some questions for him.
Mr. Pash explained the type of psychology/Freudian assignment he gave the class: a series of "single-word response
What were the two words/phrases that elicited the same single-word response from Roger? Mr. Pash gave examples of the type of words/phrases he used: red/green, parents/family, church/religion. Okay, so what single word would be so shocking and appropriate for two words/phrases? Blood? Murder? Homosexual?
Mr. Pash wrote that others were responsible for the situation Roger found himself in; he outlined that one of Roger's options to deal with his situation was "[t]o confront those responsible for the situation." So, I think we can extrapolate that more than one person would likely judge Roger harshly for his situation, perhaps his entire community, in 1981.
Mr. Pash also said he would only reveal Roger's two responses if he is "required to as a legal matter." But, in another post Mr. Pash wrote "for the next 15 years or so, I actually used Roger’s circumstances when discussing free association with my classes as an example of how it could help a therapist go in a certain direction of inquiry. But when I found out that he hadn’t been found (a rumor is after all, just a rumor), I stopped using it as an example. But that means about 1500-1800 former students know Roger’s story." So, he has revealed the mystery phrases and other details of Roger's disappearance without any legal consequences.
What were "Roger's circumstances" and "Roger's story", Mr. Pash? After so many years, and with so many people aware of the details, why not everything (again) now to us? It's your choice, of course, but would you give it some thought?
Thank you,
lgr