Still Missing CO - Suzanne Morphew, 49, Chaffee Co, 10 May 2020 *arrest* #83

Welcome to Websleuths!
Click to learn how to make a missing person's thread

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
Most likely IMO, she had authorization and did not intend to deprive the owner BM of his property, which are elements of the crime of theft in Colorado.

Colorado Revised Statutes § 18-4-401. Theft

(1) A person commits theft when he or she knowingly obtains, retains, or exercises control over anything of value of another without authorization or by threat or deception;  or receives, loans money by pawn or pledge on, or disposes of anything of value or belonging to another that he or she knows or believes to have been stolen, and:

(a) Intends to deprive the other person permanently of the use or benefit of the thing of value;

(b) Knowingly uses, conceals, or abandons the thing of value in such manner as to deprive the other person permanently of its use or benefit;

(c) Uses, conceals, or abandons the thing of value intending that such use, concealment, or abandonment will deprive the other person permanently of its use or benefit;

(d) Demands any consideration to which he or she is not legally entitled as a condition of restoring the thing of value to the other person;  or

(e) Knowingly retains the thing of value more than seventy-two hours after the agreed-upon time of return in any lease or hire agreement.

(1.5) For the purposes of this section, a thing of value is that of “another” if anyone other than the defendant has a possessory or proprietary interest therein.

(2) Theft is:

(a) Deleted by Laws 2007, Ch. 384, § 3, eff. July 1, 2007.

(b) A class 1 petty offense if the value of the thing involved is less than fifty dollars;

(b.5) Repealed by Laws 2013, Ch. 373, § 1, eff. June 5, 2013.

(c) A class 3 misdemeanor if the value of the thing involved is fifty dollars or more but less than three hundred dollars;

(d) A class 2 misdemeanor if the value of the thing involved is three hundred dollars or more but less than seven hundred fifty dollars;

(e) A class 1 misdemeanor if the value of the thing involved is seven hundred fifty dollars or more but less than two thousand dollars;

(f) A class 6 felony if the value of the thing involved is two thousand dollars or more but less than five thousand dollars;

(g) A class 5 felony if the value of the thing involved is five thousand dollars or more but less than twenty thousand dollars;

(h) A class 4 felony if the value of the thing involved is twenty thousand dollars or more but less than one hundred thousand dollars;

(i) A class 3 felony if the value of the thing involved is one hundred thousand dollars or more but less than one million dollars;  and

(j) A class 2 felony if the value of the thing involved is one million dollars or more.
 
Hard to say if it's "monkey business" or just stupidly grabbing the package instead of knocking on the door. I assume the entire Morphew family are keeping a low profile so sending a friend over to pick up the package isn't unusual...what was super strange was not knocking on the door.
Grabbing the package is called stealing.
 
I don't think the DA would he'd win that because how would Barry know she wouldn't knock and ask permission to retrieve the package. She broke the law and whose to say Barry just didn't ask her to go get the package?
There can be no doubt who told her to go get the package. What else he said, and what the contents may be, we don't know as you rightly point out. This is an interesting development to follow, nonetheless. How loyal is SD?
 
It’s one thing to retrieve your misdelivered package from your friendly neighbor. It is most certainly another to walk up to a secluded private property that has no trespassing signs, and pick up a package addressed to your out on bond accused murderer boyfriend.
 
I'm assuming (yeah, we all know what they say about that) Barry got the notice his order was delivered, and had the proverbial "oh poop" moment when he realized he never changed the address with the company he ordered from.

In a classic Barry move, he used someone (a woman, go figure) to get what he wanted. He's had 50+ years of figuring out how to get women to do what he wants.

Except for that one time where that woman got sick of his crap... and we all know what the state of CO alleges happened to her. Maybe this will be a wake up call for the new woman in his life.

jmo
 
I am really missing something here...regardless of whose name is on the package (though that may well be significant)...isn't there "Theft" going on here in addition to "Trespassing"? Being on the property is trespassing...taking an article off of the porch without permission is theft. What's the deal with no theft charge?
Amazon
He’s controlling the narrative—-for his families benefit only, IMO
Daughters, we still have semblance to a home we no longer own.
 
There can be no doubt who told her to go get the package. What else he said, and what the contents may be, we don't know as you rightly point out. This is an interesting development to follow, nonetheless. How loyal is SD?
Are we BM Cult & CO? He needs to produce leadership as to WHY his wife disappeared?
 
Most likely IMO, she had authorization and did not intend to deprive the owner BM of his property, which are elements of the crime of theft in Colorado.

Colorado Revised Statutes § 18-4-401. Theft

(1) A person commits theft when he or she knowingly obtains, retains, or exercises control over anything of value of another without authorization or by threat or deception;  or receives, loans money by pawn or pledge on, or disposes of anything of value or belonging to another that he or she knows or believes to have been stolen, and:

(a) Intends to deprive the other person permanently of the use or benefit of the thing of value;

(b) Knowingly uses, conceals, or abandons the thing of value in such manner as to deprive the other person permanently of its use or benefit;

(c) Uses, conceals, or abandons the thing of value intending that such use, concealment, or abandonment will deprive the other person permanently of its use or benefit;

(d) Demands any consideration to which he or she is not legally entitled as a condition of restoring the thing of value to the other person;  or

(e) Knowingly retains the thing of value more than seventy-two hours after the agreed-upon time of return in any lease or hire agreement.

(1.5) For the purposes of this section, a thing of value is that of “another” if anyone other than the defendant has a possessory or proprietary interest therein.

(2) Theft is:

(a) Deleted by Laws 2007, Ch. 384, § 3, eff. July 1, 2007.

(b) A class 1 petty offense if the value of the thing involved is less than fifty dollars;

(b.5) Repealed by Laws 2013, Ch. 373, § 1, eff. June 5, 2013.

(c) A class 3 misdemeanor if the value of the thing involved is fifty dollars or more but less than three hundred dollars;

(d) A class 2 misdemeanor if the value of the thing involved is three hundred dollars or more but less than seven hundred fifty dollars;

(e) A class 1 misdemeanor if the value of the thing involved is seven hundred fifty dollars or more but less than two thousand dollars;

(f) A class 6 felony if the value of the thing involved is two thousand dollars or more but less than five thousand dollars;

(g) A class 5 felony if the value of the thing involved is five thousand dollars or more but less than twenty thousand dollars;

(h) A class 4 felony if the value of the thing involved is twenty thousand dollars or more but less than one hundred thousand dollars;

(i) A class 3 felony if the value of the thing involved is one hundred thousand dollars or more but less than one million dollars;  and

(j) A class 2 felony if the value of the thing involved is one million dollars or more.
But that puts ol’ BM in a conundrum, doesn’t it? In order for her not to be charged with the theft he has to say he authorized her to pick it up. Otherwise, how would she know it was there?
 
Did she think no one would notice? I am sure the neighbors are extra vigilant.
Well, she likely knew Barry disconnected the cameras around the home when he killed Suzanne and maybe she thought the new homeowners hadn't reconnected the cameras. She is as smart as Barry is. Yep, @mass Guy, two peas in a pod.
Glad LE got her.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
65
Guests online
1,813
Total visitors
1,878

Forum statistics

Threads
605,255
Messages
18,184,766
Members
233,285
Latest member
Slowcrow
Back
Top