There's a whole lot more than a dart cap...
@MassGuy stated in an earlier post:
"Wow. Where to start......
......You focus on "would Suzanne run away," but that's the wrong question. The real question is "could Suzanne have run away," to which the answer is an unequivocal "no."
He arrives home, and her footprint ceases. There is absolutely no sign of life. Not a text, not a phone call, not a Google search; nothing.
His phone and truck data put him outside, when he claimed to be sleeping. Shortly after, her phone shuts down, just as he's leaving the house.
He puts himself at the helmet location, then proceeds to dump trash, and lie over and over to both the CBI and FBI about what he did, and where he was (he's on surveillance, and lies anyway).
He did almost no work, and spent hours in his hotel room. Then he lied repeatedly to various people about where he was when he got that phone call.
Other lies include shooting deer for antlers that they do not have, and following a herd of elk that do not herd that time of year.
They ate steaks off different plates, then ate one steak off the same plate (to match the evidence).
He said they had a perfect marriage, yet deleted texts proved otherwise.
In order to believe Barry is innocent, one literally has to ignore just about everything, and make insane leaps of logic that run contrary to the evidence.
You'd have to believe that Suzanne went on a bike ride without ever checking her phone, at a location she would never go, and forget things she would never forget.
And then was magically abducted. How convenient. Especially considering she had just asked for a divorce days before.
And of course, one would have to believe that dozens and dozens of lies mean nothing.
And everything else I can't be bothered to mention.
I'm not going to say that Barry is definitely going to be convicted, as that's unknowable. Stranger things have happened. But I can say that the evidence leaves me with absolutely no doubt as to his guilt, which certainly isn't always the case."