ExpectingUnicorns
. . . only the pure of heart can see.
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2008
- Messages
- 4,617
- Reaction score
- 3,229
This is really a good thread. It has made me realize state would probably reject me even though I think she's so guilty that I wouldn't be able to put it aside. If I hadn't been so personally involved in the TES searches and horrendous aftermath by the defense's PIs (and I didn't have to disclose those facts) they would strike me simply because I have a dear one who was a crime survivor that did not receive proper justice. The state would think that I would carry that prejudice into this case and, obviously, I haven't. I think LE has done an outstanding job here.
It tells me that no matter what facts either the defense or state uncover, by internet searches or the PJ's own disclaimers, they can never really tell what's inside the PJs' heads.
No method can be perfect no matter how much thought is put into it.
It tells me that no matter what facts either the defense or state uncover, by internet searches or the PJ's own disclaimers, they can never really tell what's inside the PJs' heads.
No method can be perfect no matter how much thought is put into it.