Thanks for looking that up. I finally read through a few articles and it seems as though the story started in The Hartford Courant on June13, 1 day short of JD being missing 3 weeks.
Here’s what I can’t wrap my head around-when LE became aware and if Fore worker (W) volunteered this info.
Either 1. W volunteered this info. If he did, then he must have done so immediately after JD went missing. I can’t imagine a scenario, where he is absolutely not complicit, that upon hearing the soon to be ex wife of your boss is missing, & W has been driving boss’s truck , IN the town from which she went missing, he would have sat on the information and not immediately called the police. But it hard to imagine LE had the info -while stopping cars and handing out flyers, begging for tips and video,-pretty much guaranteeing everyone in this small town was on high alert-and no one gossiped about W turning in his truck to LE. Seems it would have been near impossible to keep it under the radar of all those reporters for 3 weeks.
So 2. LE MUST have gone to W. Perhaps it took a few weeks to pick up the truck on video and identify W. The actual seizure of the truck, phone & computer would have occurred closer to the date of the newspaper article. This sceanario makes the most sense to me, but if accurate, begs the question gnawing at me; why didn’t W go immediately to LE?