I appreciate your feedback, though I respectfully and ENTIRELY disagree. MT's atty released court transcripts that showed his fear in exactly what his requests being denied would mean for her case.
In combining the 3 cases Schoenhorn's 2/2/21 transcript reads:
http://appellateinquiry.jud.ct.gov/DocumentDisplayer.aspx?AppId=2&DocId=2G/ovrouCzFOXMr7OER3mA==
And THIS mouth full of marbles about needing a jury from Hartford on top of MT's recent social media ploy to identify primarily with other countries outside of where she was born (Memphis TN, USA) and align with potential jurors in Hartford? Nah
http://appellateinquiry.jud.ct.gov/DocumentDisplayer.aspx?AppId=2&DocId=2G/ovrouCzFOXMr7OER3mA==
I have not replied back to you before now because I remain unsure of your genuine POV, respectfully. This ruling, after 2 denials on the removal of her GPS tracker in the last few weeks? Nope, I still believe she is freaked by these 2 MAJOR rulings that move the case forward exponentially. MOO