SilkySifaka
Active Member
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2011
- Messages
- 2,933
- Reaction score
- 30
Whether or not they are guilty, they need a lawyer of Tacopina's abilities under these circumstances. This is a very strange case which is why I am very interested in it, having been involved in very complicated international parental kidnapping cases in the past.
Tacopina is acting as a victim's lawyer to bridge the gap between the clients and law enforcement and to keep them informed about the process and as a defense lawyer to protect them from over-zealous LE.
I don't know all of the details of what he is doing, but he states he is working closely with the FBI (the FBI is not complaining), he is rescheduling the children's interviews that had been cancelled by CS, he has his clients' confidence as they decided to continue with him and he is curtailing the media involvement in this case. He has counseled his clients to cooperate as legally advisable.
These are all good things. Neither of his clients have been described as "suspects" or "persons of interest." There is a missing infant, there are several witnesses to a baby having been seen with a man that night and no ransom has been demanded that we know of. This could be a very delicate situation to bring someone forward. I go with a tough, highly experienced lawyer with a strong relationship with the FBI.
Exactly! And he has a track record of being a victims advocate as well as criminal defense attorney, He represented Annie Le's family and Imette St. Guillen's (both high profile murders) as such when the perps were caught.