The ones I couldn't get from Amazon, I bought on ebay, used copies. The only reason you might want to get MTJD would be for the crime scene photos, but I think the police video in "Invisible Intruder" and other forensic shows on the subject are much better. The photos do help but it helped more to see the scene in lifesize images. Don't even bother with what the author, Christopher Brown, had to say. His writing is very poor and he tends to twist facts to support his argument. He gets really bizarre. The other three books are not perfect, but you get a view of the case from three different people who did go to the trial. And each has something to contribute that the others did not. All of them are more factual and more down to earth than Brown's.Fritzy's Mom said:Yeah, you're right...I would like to read them, but from what I've seen on this board, most of them are pretty hard to come by (especially MTJD)....
I agree with you. I didn't think the state nailed the motive either, but the jury didn't need motive to determine if she commited the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.Fritzy's Mom said:No matter what is in the books, though, testimony at trial re: Darlie's character was just not, IMO, damaging enough to support the prosection's theory of why she did it. I know, I know - the prosecution doesn't have to prove motive - but Greg Davis described Darlie as a pretty ugly person in his opening remarks ("cold," "materialistic," "self-centered," etc.), so I think the jury had a duty to ask itself whether or not he provided evidence to support his statements...
Greg Davis suggested a motive, so as far as I'm concerned, it was fair territory for the jury to consider.