Kids crying or Damon touching her shoulder saying mommie, mommie, mommie? HUGE dif.
During the trial, did she said there was a man on top of her and a struggle ensued? I can't remember, but I don't think so. She was "frightening," remember? Not fighting.
You can't gloss over this stuff, its important. She goes from seeing a man disappear into the utility room to a life and death struggle. That's huge. She goes from not being able to give a description to saying his hat was on backward. If someone is telling the truth, it doesn't matter whose asking the questions. It doesn't matter where the person is, who else is there and how much later it was. The story comes out the same. Sure, you can add things now and then that you may not have remembered, but things don't appear and disappear. People don't show up in one version and then multiply, divide and disappear.
The only thing that can back up Darlie's stories is the evidence. Evidence that isn't there. Its entirely possible for someone to go into a house and kill or abduct a person and not leave any evidence. We've seen that. However, the people in the house where that sort of thing occurs don't change their stories 16 times. They're consistent. Darlie's stories stink to high Heaven. IF there was ANY evidence of an intruder, I'd err on the side of caution and say she deserved another trial. If the DNA evidence turns out to help her, so be it. However, if it doesn't, some of her supporters are gonna have to pull their heads out of the sand and admit it just as they would want us on the other side of the fence to admit something that could help her. I'm willing to be the first one to stand up and say ahhhhhhhh should the DNA evidence point to anyone else.