So no opinions?
Alrighty then ..
So what spurred Darrin's admission that there was an argument and a discussion of seperation on the 5th? How could this reflect positively on Darlie and her appeals?
But by their same reasoning, Darlie also had motive to and DID murder the children.Even though there was evidence that the two argued the night of the murders, it was denied by the family until Darin signed an Affidavit during the appeals process. In fact, even after I was told by a family member that there was a fight, I was called a liar. It was after that Affidavit was made public that the family finally decided they had no alternative but to confess that there was indeed a hell of a fight the night of the murders. The reason that Darlie's team believes it may help her appeal is that they're trying to show that its possible that Darin had motive to and possibly did murder the boys.
But by their same reasoning, Darlie also had motive to and DID murder the children.
"The reason that Darlie's team believes it may help her appeal is that they're trying to show that its possible that Darin had motive to and possibly did murder the boys."
I don't think this could help her appeals since Darlie has always insisted that she saw the intruder 'at the end of the sofa walking away.' I've heard her stating this on tape. She says she just saw his face 'in profile' and insists it wasn't Darin. I think Darin put that bit about the fight in his affidavit to show that Darlie was angry.