Fair enough! I am not at all saying we should question LE. I think you're right that they just recorded what they were told and possibly that they did emphasize that he lied because they thought he was involved. I guess I was just making the point that everyone interprets words and interactions differently. I could have the exact same conversation w/ 2 different people and 1 could potentially come away from that conversation interpreting what I had said as a deliberate lie whereas the other person could have interpreted as me just being flustered/forgetting something, etc. It's not a point worth arguing about, for sure, because we don't know what was said anyway so I give the benefit of the doubt to LE, not to JW.
BBM #1: I do believe they put that in the report because it shows that during the interview with JW 1) his story changed w/r/t several key pieces of information and 2) they need to be very accurate in the report because they can't risk a mistrial or a "not guilty" verdict, especially in such a terrible case like this one. It was stated in the report because he did admit he lied when called out on it (they showed him texts from the other witnesses phone that contradicted his story, IIRC). Even if he is not guilty, they just want to make sure they state every little detail that may be pertinent to the investigation and arrests of everyone involved in this crime. LEO is very very careful about writing reports. Nothing would be just gratuitously thrown in there and stated as fact when it was not so. JMO.
That said, I totally understand what you mean in the second part BBM.
AND I can see how JW could be totally innocent. When I am rambling on about my day or details and I am just busy or hurried, etc, I do need to refer to my phone about important things. I would say something like "oh hold on let me check my phone because I remember discussing it but not the exact specifics, etc" - this is the norm for me (busy mom, PTA stuff, working, running errands, etc, sometimes I dont even remember what I had for breakfast, if any, or I recall erroneously something I could have sworn was accurate but it happened several days before- and that's just me being the tiniest bit busy or rushed, I can't imagine how I would feel if I were in JWs shoes, or anyone that had to be interviewed for this horrific crime)
Second- I often speak in hyperboles- just part of my sometimes awkward and sarcastic sense of humor, part of my affect when talking about anything usually- very loosey goosey with the vocabulary and "sayings" (unless it comes to speaking for something work-related)- but I often utter the phrase "oh wait a sec, I lied" or "oh nevermind, I lied" when I mis-remember a detail about anything- i.e. when I was talking to my husband last week "yeah I have a doctors appointment on 7/21 at 2- let me just double check my calendar to make sure"- (kristin checks calendar on phone) "OH! wait! I lied, it's the 23rd and at 10 am!"
So in that sense- maybe w JW its just the way he speaks- maybe he's dead in the water without his phone like I am - I have to refer to texts for everything- like pick up times for kids, grocery lists or items to pick up at the store that I have H text me- otherwise I would remember ZERO things.
I'd be a horrible police witness lol. Just horrendous.
I can also see how its suspicious that JW just made up details. Maybe he was ashamed that he took pics of the money (because his online presence often refers to something like "cash, money, power" or something like that)- maybe he was super embarassed that he was snapping selfies w cash while his boss/family was being tortured and set on fire?
Dunno. All speculation- my own opinions, etc.