FelicityLemon
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2015
- Messages
- 3,302
- Reaction score
- 5,970
Anything is possible, but I keep on trying to figure out how one would confidently assume, based on what we know, that DW worked alone in that house. (Besides the absence of more arrests.) We know that LE seems to have evidence that made them feel confident that that crime required others' involvement. And there were multiple vests, the two pizzas, and the well-groomed person driving the porsche. And he obviously did work with others after the fact. So he wasn't a lone stallion. Can it be said with certainty that he didn't also work with others beforehand and/or during the crime. Is there a reason that he wouldn't have tried to tap into his heinous network to get some help in the crime? Even just to help carry things or be on lookout?
I'm not confident about it, I just lean that way I could be totally wrong! I think it just bugs me to think that more than one evil nasty person would go along with this. I look forward to phone dumps of DW and partner/s. I do believe at least one person knew about the burglary beforehand, but I honestly don't think the rest of it was planned. Again, I could be totally wrong. I forget that our non-criminal brains don't automatically go to those places. I keep thinking like ME, and thinking with self-preservation of not wanting to get caught, I'd go daytime robbery less chance of encountering anyone. I forgot that he said he wasn't afraid of police and if not afraid of LE, he'd certainly not be afraid of women and children. Assuming the man of the house would be busy at one of his many businesses. I keep going for the most simple idea.
Honestly, I can't imagine that there's not some video somewhere that shows someone else involved! It's possible that he had *someone* with him and even if he was alone with booty, he'd still need a ride from there. I don't think he had in mind to steal art or cars, I think cash, maybe jewelry if found, but definitely cash. Easy to carry, if he was searched for any reason, he'd have to explain jewelry?
More unanswered questions for me, not all may mean anything, but I am curious.
Why take a bus to Brooklyn?
Why risk paying $1,000 to an Uber driver? Even if he wasn't identified immediately via DNA like he was, that driver had an interesting story to tell unless he was involved in some way, too. I don't know why that would be, but *new thought as I'm typing" that driver would have been identified by LE by now I think. If he still had any of the cash, he may have had to give it to LE?
He could tell where he picked up DW, where he dropped him off, how the arrangements were made, payment up front, half up front? Was he at all leery of DW - was he acting funny or cool as a cucumber?
Wasn't he suspicious that someone would pay him that much cash?
Was he worried that DW would bail without paying him the minute they stopped anywhere?
I haven't seen anything in the media regarding Uber making any statement - does anyone here recall any info about this?
LE is impressively (and frustratingly) tight-lipped with this. Understandable.
I do hope a GOOD INFORMATIVE book will be written when this is over.